PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGC vs. CURLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CGC and CURLF is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

CGC vs. CURLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-59.18%
-64.59%
CGC
CURLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGC:

-0.32

CURLF:

-0.81

Sortino Ratio

CGC:

0.36

CURLF:

-1.25

Omega Ratio

CGC:

1.04

CURLF:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

CGC:

-0.47

CURLF:

-0.73

Martin Ratio

CGC:

-0.88

CURLF:

-1.56

Ulcer Index

CGC:

53.86%

CURLF:

42.89%

Daily Std Dev

CGC:

146.70%

CURLF:

83.25%

Max Drawdown

CGC:

-99.53%

CURLF:

-91.83%

Current Drawdown

CGC:

-99.53%

CURLF:

-91.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CGC:

$396.81M

CURLF:

$1.12B

EPS

CGC:

-$4.96

CURLF:

-$0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

CGC:

$201.99M

CURLF:

$1.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CGC:

$53.14M

CURLF:

$481.89M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGC achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly higher than CURLF's -5.13% return.


CGC

YTD

-2.92%

1M

-23.56%

6M

-58.95%

1Y

-41.67%

5Y*

-58.19%

10Y*

-17.76%

CURLF

YTD

-5.13%

1M

-16.15%

6M

-64.59%

1Y

-64.51%

5Y*

-26.02%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGC vs. CURLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGC is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGC is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGC is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGC is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGC is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGC is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CURLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CURLF is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CURLF is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CURLF is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CURLF is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CURLF is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CURLF is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGC vs. CURLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.32-0.81
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGC, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.36-1.25
The chart of Omega ratio for CGC, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.040.84
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.47-0.73
The chart of Martin ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.88, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-0.88-1.56
CGC
CURLF

The current CGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is higher than the CURLF Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGC and CURLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.32
-0.81
CGC
CURLF

Dividends

CGC vs. CURLF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CGC nor CURLF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CGC vs. CURLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGC drawdown since its inception was -99.53%, which is greater than CURLF's maximum drawdown of -91.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGC and CURLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-99.49%
-91.78%
CGC
CURLF

Volatility

CGC vs. CURLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) is 15.74%, while Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a volatility of 20.90%. This indicates that CGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CURLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
15.74%
20.90%
CGC
CURLF

Financials

CGC vs. CURLF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canopy Growth Corporation and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab