PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGC vs. CURLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CGCCURLF
YTD Return-27.01%-45.32%
1Y Return-29.73%-34.32%
3Y Return (Ann)-70.49%-39.43%
5Y Return (Ann)-52.50%-17.33%
Sharpe Ratio-0.21-0.40
Sortino Ratio0.82-0.08
Omega Ratio1.090.99
Calmar Ratio-0.31-0.38
Martin Ratio-0.62-1.03
Ulcer Index50.63%33.41%
Daily Std Dev152.66%85.72%
Max Drawdown-99.51%-90.78%
Current Drawdown-99.34%-87.67%

Fundamentals


CGCCURLF
Market Cap$533.71M$1.54B
EPS-$4.99-$0.28
Total Revenue (TTM)$254.58M$1.03B
Gross Profit (TTM)$68.58M$477.56M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CGC and CURLF is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CGC vs. CURLF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CGC achieves a -27.01% return, which is significantly higher than CURLF's -45.32% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-65.55%
-60.29%
CGC
CURLF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGC vs. CURLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGC, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGC, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.62
CURLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CURLF, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -1.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.03

CGC vs. CURLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the CURLF Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGC and CURLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.21
-0.40
CGC
CURLF

Dividends

CGC vs. CURLF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CGC nor CURLF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CGC vs. CURLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGC drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than CURLF's maximum drawdown of -90.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGC and CURLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-99.29%
-87.67%
CGC
CURLF

Volatility

CGC vs. CURLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) is 36.51%, while Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a volatility of 53.60%. This indicates that CGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CURLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
36.51%
53.60%
CGC
CURLF

Financials

CGC vs. CURLF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canopy Growth Corporation and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items