PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGC vs. SNDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CGC vs. SNDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CGC having a -16.04% return and SNDL slightly higher at -15.66%.


CGC

1D
-1.04%
1M
-7.97%
YTD
-16.04%
6M
-27.49%
1Y
-22.81%
3Y*
-43.03%
5Y*
-66.76%
10Y*
-26.81%

SNDL

1D
-1.41%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
-15.66%
6M
-21.79%
1Y
12.00%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
-32.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGC vs. SNDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CGC
Canopy Growth Corporation
-16.04%-58.39%-46.38%-77.88%-73.54%-64.57%16.83%-35.39%
SNDL
Sundial Growers Inc.
-15.66%-7.26%9.15%-21.53%-63.86%22.13%-84.27%-76.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CGC and SNDL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.59

The correlation between CGC and SNDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CGC:

$368.47M

SNDL:

$365.82M

EPS

CGC:

-CA$1.23

SNDL:

-CA$0.04

PS Ratio

CGC:

1.30

SNDL:

0.55

PB Ratio

CGC:

0.75

SNDL:

0.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

CGC:

CA$312.34M

SNDL:

CA$940.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CGC:

CA$77.66M

SNDL:

CA$242.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

CGC:

-CA$205.34M

SNDL:

CA$43.64M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGC vs. SNDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGC
CGC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGC Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGC Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SNDL
SNDL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGC vs. SNDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGCSNDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.10

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

0.22

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

0.33

-0.98

CGC vs. SNDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the SNDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGC and SNDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGC vs. SNDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGC drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, roughly equal to the maximum SNDL drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGC and SNDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGCSNDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.85%

-99.07%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.38%

-54.17%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.10%

-54.34%

-40.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.67%

-87.90%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.83%

-98.92%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.21%

-94.44%

+32.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.37%

35.99%

-0.62%

Volatility

CGC vs. SNDL - Volatility Comparison

Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) has a higher volatility of 9.37% compared to Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) at 6.77%. This indicates that CGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGCSNDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.37%

6.77%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.00%

30.79%

+17.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.30%

68.40%

+34.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

124.27%

70.52%

+53.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

103.40%

114.79%

-11.39%

Dividends

CGC vs. SNDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CGC nor SNDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CGC vs. SNDL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canopy Growth Corporation and Sundial Growers Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
71.25M
199.17M
(CGC) Total Revenue
(SNDL) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CGC and SNDL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGC has higher volatility (9.37%) compared to SNDL (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGC dropped -99.85% vs SNDL's -99.07%.

SNDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGC and SNDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer