PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGC vs. ACB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CGCACB
YTD Return-27.01%-11.80%
1Y Return-29.73%-9.68%
3Y Return (Ann)-70.49%-63.14%
5Y Return (Ann)-52.50%-58.22%
Sharpe Ratio-0.21-0.09
Sortino Ratio0.820.70
Omega Ratio1.091.08
Calmar Ratio-0.31-0.10
Martin Ratio-0.62-0.31
Ulcer Index50.63%30.94%
Daily Std Dev152.66%102.84%
Max Drawdown-99.51%-99.80%
Current Drawdown-99.34%-99.70%

Fundamentals


CGCACB
Market Cap$533.71M$259.62M
EPS-$4.99-$0.48
Total Revenue (TTM)$254.58M$215.27M
Gross Profit (TTM)$68.58M$115.52M
EBITDA (TTM)-$81.08M$8.45M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between CGC and ACB is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CGC vs. ACB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CGC achieves a -27.01% return, which is significantly lower than ACB's -11.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-65.62%
-43.10%
CGC
ACB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGC vs. ACB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGC, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGC, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.62
ACB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACB, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACB, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ACB, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACB, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ACB, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.31

CGC vs. ACB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the ACB Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGC and ACB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.60JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.21
-0.09
CGC
ACB

Dividends

CGC vs. ACB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CGC nor ACB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CGC vs. ACB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGC drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, roughly equal to the maximum ACB drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGC and ACB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-99.50%-99.00%-98.50%-98.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-99.34%
-99.70%
CGC
ACB

Volatility

CGC vs. ACB - Volatility Comparison

Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) has a higher volatility of 36.51% compared to Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) at 25.48%. This indicates that CGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
36.51%
25.48%
CGC
ACB

Financials

CGC vs. ACB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canopy Growth Corporation and Aurora Cannabis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items