CGC vs. ACB
CGC (Canopy Growth Corporation) and ACB (Aurora Cannabis Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 10 years, CGC returned -26.81%/yr vs -23.86%/yr for ACB. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CGC vs. ACB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGC achieves a -16.04% return, which is significantly higher than ACB's -31.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CGC has underperformed ACB with an annualized return of -26.81%, while ACB has yielded a comparatively higher -23.86% annualized return.
CGC
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -16.04%
- 6M
- -27.49%
- 1Y
- -22.81%
- 3Y*
- -43.03%
- 5Y*
- -66.76%
- 10Y*
- -26.81%
ACB
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -31.99%
- 6M
- -38.81%
- 1Y
- -29.66%
- 3Y*
- -19.55%
- 5Y*
- -49.82%
- 10Y*
- -23.86%
CGC vs. ACB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGC Canopy Growth Corporation | -16.04% | -58.39% | -46.38% | -77.88% | -73.54% | -64.57% | 16.83% | -21.51% | 13.58% | 246.87% |
ACB Aurora Cannabis Inc. | -31.99% | -0.71% | -10.75% | -48.38% | -82.95% | -34.90% | -67.94% | -56.45% | -34.99% | 343.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGC and ACB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014 | 0.66 |
The correlation between CGC and ACB shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CGC:
$368.47M
ACB:
$164.94M
CGC:
-CA$1.23
ACB:
-CA$1.33
CGC:
1.30
ACB:
0.74
CGC:
0.75
ACB:
0.46
CGC:
CA$312.34M
ACB:
CA$310.87M
CGC:
CA$77.66M
ACB:
CA$176.08M
CGC:
-CA$205.34M
ACB:
CA$10.48M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGC vs. ACB — Risk / Return Rank
CGC
ACB
CGC vs. ACB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGC | ACB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.96 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.55 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | -0.94 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGC vs. ACB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGC drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, roughly equal to the maximum ACB drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGC and ACB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGC | ACB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -99.80% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.38% | -53.93% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.10% | -70.80% | -24.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.67% | -96.93% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.85% | -99.80% | -0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | -99.80% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.21% | -70.71% | +8.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.37% | 31.63% | +3.74% |
Volatility
CGC vs. ACB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) is 9.37%, while Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) has a volatility of 12.65%. This indicates that CGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGC | ACB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.37% | 12.65% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.00% | 37.60% | +10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.30% | 65.40% | +37.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 124.27% | 89.74% | +34.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.40% | 97.78% | +5.62% |
Dividends
CGC vs. ACB - Dividend Comparison
Neither CGC nor ACB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CGC vs. ACB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canopy Growth Corporation and Aurora Cannabis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CGC and ACB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACB has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to CGC (9.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGC dropped -99.85% vs ACB's -99.80%.
CGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGC and ACB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer