CRON vs. BABA
CRON (Cronos Group Inc.) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. CRON operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, CRON returned -21.36%/yr vs -10.74%/yr for BABA. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRON vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRON achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -22.32% return.
CRON
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- -18.04%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- -21.36%
- 10Y*
- —
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
CRON vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRON Cronos Group Inc. | 1.90% | 30.20% | -3.35% | -17.72% | -35.20% | -43.52% | -9.52% | -26.18% | 34.43% | 600.87% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRON and BABA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2016 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
CRON:
-$0.01
BABA:
CN¥33.90
CRON:
3.52
BABA:
2.26
CRON:
$220.07M
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
CRON:
$68.18M
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
CRON:
$2.28M
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRON vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
CRON
BABA
CRON vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRON | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.03 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | -0.06 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | -0.12 | +2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRON vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRON drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRON and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRON | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.16% | -80.09% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.91% | -39.94% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.36% | -39.94% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.06% | -72.48% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.69% | -62.20% | -26.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -37.56% | -26.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.34% | 19.58% | -4.24% |
Volatility
CRON vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) is 9.44%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 10.07%. This indicates that CRON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRON | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 10.07% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.10% | 29.24% | +0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.46% | 43.83% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.86% | 51.40% | +2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.63% | 43.40% | +31.23% |
Dividends
CRON vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
CRON has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
CRON Cronos Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CRON vs. BABA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cronos Group Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRON vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison
CRON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cronos Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.15M and revenue of 58.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
CRON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cronos Group Inc. reported an operating income of -1.83M and revenue of 58.97M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
CRON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cronos Group Inc. reported a net income of 13.75M and revenue of 58.97M, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRON and BABA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABA has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to CRON (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRON dropped -93.16% vs BABA's -80.09%.
CRON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRON and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer