CRMU vs. AAPB
CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRMU is passively managed, while AAPB is actively managed. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CRMU charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AAPB.
Performance
CRMU vs. AAPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRMU
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- -69.93%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AAPB
- 1D
- -15.09%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- 6M
- 30.60%
- YTD
- 18.01%
- 1Y
- 103.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.41M | $3.60M | $2.76M | |
| $344.04K | $316.58K | $869.62K |
CRMU vs. AAPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -89.89% |
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 16.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMU and AAPB is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMU vs. AAPB — Risk / Return Rank
CRMU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AAPB
CRMU vs. AAPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRMU | AAPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRMU vs. AAPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMU drawdown since its inception was -91.02%, which is greater than AAPB's maximum drawdown of -58.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMU and AAPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMU | AAPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.02% | -58.13% | -32.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.89% | -18.24% | -71.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.70% | -18.89% | -34.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.28% | — |
Volatility
CRMU vs. AAPB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMU | AAPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 229.81% | 52.62% | +177.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 229.81% | 52.51% | +177.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 229.81% | 52.51% | +177.30% |
CRMU vs. AAPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPB's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMU vs. AAPB - Dividend Comparison
CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 3.72% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 18.75% |
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMU and AAPB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AAPB.
AAPB has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMU and 1.15% for AAPB.
Find the right allocation for CRMU and AAPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer