CRMU vs. GLGG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and GLGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. CRMU is passively managed, while GLGG is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GLGG.

Performance

CRMU vs. GLGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRMU

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -37.43%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLGG

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -16.56%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: -37.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMU vs. GLGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-41.42%
GLGG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF	38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMU and GLGG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

CRMU vs. GLGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRMU	GLGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	-0.24	-0.08

Drawdowns

CRMU vs. GLGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMU drawdown since its inception was -68.12%, smaller than the maximum GLGG drawdown of -90.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMU and GLGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMU	GLGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.12%	-90.66%	+22.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.73%	-77.42%	+27.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.24%	-57.94%	+21.70%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMU	GLGG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	253.34%	175.94%	+77.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	253.34%	175.94%	+77.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	253.34%	175.94%	+77.40%

CRMU vs. GLGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GLGG's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMU vs. GLGG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMU nor GLGG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMU and GLGG in my portfolio?

CRMU and GLGG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMU or GLGG?

On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMU or GLGG?

CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for GLGG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMU or GLGG?

CRMU and GLGG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRMU and GLGG?

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMU and 0.76% for GLGG.