CRMU vs. GLGG
CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and GLGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. CRMU is passively managed, while GLGG is actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CRMU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GLGG.
Performance
CRMU vs. GLGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRMU
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- -69.93%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GLGG
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -33.94%
- 6M
- -69.74%
- YTD
- -55.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $344.04K | $316.58K | $869.62K | |
| $421.96K | $443.67K | $533.01K |
CRMU vs. GLGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -89.89% |
GLGG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF | -38.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMU and GLGG is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMU vs. GLGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRMU vs. GLGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMU drawdown since its inception was -91.02%, roughly equal to the maximum GLGG drawdown of -92.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMU and GLGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMU | GLGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.02% | -92.23% | +1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.89% | -90.04% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.70% | -61.58% | +7.88% |
Volatility
CRMU vs. GLGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMU | GLGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 229.81% | 184.08% | +45.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 229.81% | 184.08% | +45.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 229.81% | 184.08% | +45.73% |
CRMU vs. GLGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GLGG's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMU vs. GLGG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRMU nor GLGG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMU and GLGG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for GLGG.
CRMU and GLGG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMU and 0.76% for GLGG.
Find the right allocation for CRMU and GLGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer