PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRLBF vs. CURLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cresco Labs Inc (CRLBF) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRLBF

1D
-4.65%
1M
-21.74%
6M
-38.31%
YTD
-47.84%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
-26.11%
5Y*
-42.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-24.10%

CURLF

1D
1.03%
1M
142.58%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$285.67K$292.41K$486.63K
$1.09M$1.13M$1.07M

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
CRLBF
Cresco Labs Inc
-29.15%
CURLF
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.
-19.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CRLBF and CURLF is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRLBF:

$230.25M

CURLF:

$2.33B

EPS

CRLBF:

-$0.39

CURLF:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

CRLBF:

0.35

CURLF:

5.24

PB Ratio

CRLBF:

0.69

CURLF:

8.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRLBF:

$641.80M

CURLF:

$1.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRLBF:

$311.73M

CURLF:

$528.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRLBF:

$108.21M

CURLF:

$188.46M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRLBF vs. CURLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRLBF
CRLBF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CRLBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRLBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRLBF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CRLBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRLBF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CURLF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cresco Labs Inc (CRLBF) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRLBFCURLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRLBF drawdown since its inception was -97.45%, which is greater than CURLF's maximum drawdown of -66.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRLBF and CURLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRLBFCURLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.45%

-66.67%

-30.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.20%

-19.14%

-77.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.15%

-17.39%

-50.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.47%

Volatility

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRLBFCURLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.64%

616.47%

-469.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

98.44%

616.47%

-518.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.85%

616.47%

-527.62%

Dividends

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRLBF nor CURLF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cresco Labs Inc and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cresco Labs Inc and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CRLBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cresco Labs Inc reported a gross profit of 69.55M and revenue of 149.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.6%.

CURLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.91M and revenue of 319.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.

CRLBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cresco Labs Inc reported an operating income of 14.63M and revenue of 149.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

CURLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 742.57K and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

CRLBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cresco Labs Inc reported a net income of -12.89M and revenue of 149.23M, resulting in a net margin of -8.6%.

CURLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 68.83M and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRLBF and CURLF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRLBF and CURLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer