PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRLBF vs. CURLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cresco Labs Inc (CRLBF) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRLBF achieves a -25.67% return, which is significantly lower than CURLF's 42.46% return.


CRLBF

1D
-3.74%
1M
-16.12%
YTD
-25.67%
6M
9.37%
1Y
55.26%
3Y*
-18.19%
5Y*
-40.00%
10Y*

CURLF

1D
-1.37%
1M
5.90%
YTD
42.46%
6M
54.08%
1Y
333.84%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
-24.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CRLBF
Cresco Labs Inc
-25.67%34.61%-32.61%-24.68%-73.01%-32.39%43.85%1.66%35.96%
CURLF
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.
42.46%61.54%-61.58%-5.52%-52.25%-24.82%89.73%33.12%1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CRLBF and CURLF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018

0.63

The correlation between CRLBF and CURLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRLBF:

$333.01M

CURLF:

$2.78B

EPS

CRLBF:

-$0.39

CURLF:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

CRLBF:

0.50

CURLF:

2.12

PB Ratio

CRLBF:

0.99

CURLF:

3.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRLBF:

$641.80M

CURLF:

$1.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRLBF:

$311.73M

CURLF:

$528.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRLBF:

$108.21M

CURLF:

$188.46M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRLBF vs. CURLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRLBF
CRLBF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CRLBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRLBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRLBF Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CRLBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRLBF Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CURLF
CURLF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CURLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURLF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CURLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURLF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cresco Labs Inc (CRLBF) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRLBFCURLFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

2.63

-2.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

3.09

-1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

5.56

-4.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.47

10.47

-9.00

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRLBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the CURLF Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRLBF and CURLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRLBFCURLFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

2.63

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

-0.28

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

-0.07

-0.15

Drawdowns

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRLBF drawdown since its inception was -97.45%, roughly equal to the maximum CURLF drawdown of -95.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRLBF and CURLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRLBFCURLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.45%

-95.70%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.29%

-59.79%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.90%

-88.28%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.30%

-95.06%

-1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.59%

-79.01%

-15.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.58%

-58.25%

-9.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.56%

31.77%

+3.79%

Volatility

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Volatility Comparison

Cresco Labs Inc (CRLBF) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) have volatilities of 24.90% and 25.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRLBFCURLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.90%

25.73%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

110.15%

87.03%

+23.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.41%

128.02%

+22.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

98.13%

87.93%

+10.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.45%

84.26%

+5.19%

Dividends

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRLBF nor CURLF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cresco Labs Inc and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
149.23M
319.74M
(CRLBF) Total Revenue
(CURLF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRLBF vs. CURLF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cresco Labs Inc and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
46.6%
38.1%
Portfolio components
CRLBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cresco Labs Inc reported a gross profit of 69.55M and revenue of 149.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.6%.

CURLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.91M and revenue of 319.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.

CRLBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cresco Labs Inc reported an operating income of 14.63M and revenue of 149.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

CURLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 742.57K and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

CRLBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cresco Labs Inc reported a net income of -12.89M and revenue of 149.23M, resulting in a net margin of -8.6%.

CURLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 68.83M and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRLBF and CURLF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CURLF has higher volatility (25.73%) compared to CRLBF (24.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRLBF dropped -97.45% vs CURLF's -95.70%.

CURLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRLBF and CURLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer