CRLBF vs. GTBIF
CRLBF (Cresco Labs Inc) and GTBIF (Green Thumb Industries Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 5 years, CRLBF returned -41.03%/yr vs -24.68%/yr for GTBIF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CRLBF vs. GTBIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRLBF achieves a -37.40% return, which is significantly lower than GTBIF's -8.91% return.
CRLBF
- 1D
- -4.94%
- 1M
- -10.48%
- YTD
- -37.40%
- 6M
- -34.36%
- 1Y
- 78.41%
- 3Y*
- -21.63%
- 5Y*
- -41.03%
- 10Y*
- —
GTBIF
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- -8.91%
- 6M
- -3.43%
- 1Y
- 48.78%
- 3Y*
- -1.30%
- 5Y*
- -24.68%
- 10Y*
- 82.87%
CRLBF vs. GTBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRLBF Cresco Labs Inc | -37.40% | 34.61% | -32.61% | -24.68% | -73.01% | -32.39% | 43.85% | 1.66% | 27.28% |
GTBIF Green Thumb Industries Inc | -8.91% | -1.64% | -27.64% | 30.67% | -61.01% | -9.55% | 151.28% | 21.42% | -19.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRLBF and GTBIF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CRLBF and GTBIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRLBF:
$280.46M
GTBIF:
$1.70B
CRLBF:
-$0.39
GTBIF:
$0.52
CRLBF:
0.42
GTBIF:
1.43
CRLBF:
0.83
GTBIF:
0.89
CRLBF:
$641.80M
GTBIF:
$1.20B
CRLBF:
$311.73M
GTBIF:
$575.26M
CRLBF:
$108.21M
GTBIF:
$438.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRLBF vs. GTBIF — Risk / Return Rank
CRLBF
GTBIF
CRLBF vs. GTBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cresco Labs Inc (CRLBF) and Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRLBF | GTBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.16 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 2.25 | -0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRLBF vs. GTBIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRLBF drawdown since its inception was -97.45%, roughly equal to the maximum GTBIF drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRLBF and GTBIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRLBF | GTBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.45% | -99.97% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.81% | -42.24% | -17.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.90% | -68.66% | -15.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.28% | -85.71% | -10.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.44% | -80.96% | -14.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.74% | -78.97% | +11.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.45% | 21.76% | +15.69% |
Volatility
CRLBF vs. GTBIF - Volatility Comparison
Cresco Labs Inc (CRLBF) has a higher volatility of 18.20% compared to Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF) at 15.37%. This indicates that CRLBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRLBF | GTBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.20% | 15.37% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 84.29% | 50.53% | +33.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.14% | 97.26% | +52.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 98.30% | 72.00% | +26.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.27% | 46,700.56% | -46,611.29% |
Dividends
CRLBF vs. GTBIF - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRLBF nor GTBIF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRLBF vs. GTBIF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cresco Labs Inc and Green Thumb Industries Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRLBF vs. GTBIF - Profitability Comparison
CRLBF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cresco Labs Inc reported a gross profit of 69.55M and revenue of 149.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.6%.
GTBIF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a gross profit of 143.65M and revenue of 300.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.9%.
CRLBF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cresco Labs Inc reported an operating income of 14.63M and revenue of 149.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.
GTBIF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported an operating income of 40.73M and revenue of 300.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.
CRLBF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cresco Labs Inc reported a net income of -12.89M and revenue of 149.23M, resulting in a net margin of -8.6%.
GTBIF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a net income of 15.40M and revenue of 300.19M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRLBF and GTBIF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRLBF has higher volatility (18.20%) compared to GTBIF (15.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRLBF dropped -97.45% vs GTBIF's -99.97%.
CRLBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRLBF and GTBIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer