CURLF vs. GTBIF
CURLF (Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.) and GTBIF (Green Thumb Industries Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic industry within the Healthcare sector. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CURLF vs. GTBIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CURLF
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 142.58%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GTBIF
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- YTD
- -11.65%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- -0.05%
- 5Y*
- -24.71%
- 10Y*
- 70.90%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.09M | $1.13M | $1.07M | |
| $3.25M | $4.27M | $3.97M |
CURLF vs. GTBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CURLF Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. | -19.14% |
GTBIF Green Thumb Industries Inc | -12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CURLF and GTBIF is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
CURLF:
$2.33B
GTBIF:
$1.65B
CURLF:
-$0.13
GTBIF:
$0.52
CURLF:
5.24
GTBIF:
1.38
CURLF:
8.31
GTBIF:
0.87
CURLF:
$1.30B
GTBIF:
$1.20B
CURLF:
$528.91M
GTBIF:
$575.26M
CURLF:
$188.46M
GTBIF:
$438.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CURLF vs. GTBIF — Risk / Return Rank
CURLF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GTBIF
CURLF vs. GTBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Green Thumb Industries Inc (GTBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CURLF | GTBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CURLF vs. GTBIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -66.67%, smaller than the maximum GTBIF drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and GTBIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CURLF | GTBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.67% | -99.97% | +33.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -68.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -85.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.14% | -81.53% | +62.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.39% | -78.98% | +61.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.23% | — |
Volatility
CURLF vs. GTBIF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CURLF | GTBIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 616.47% | 96.24% | +520.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 616.47% | 72.05% | +544.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 616.47% | 46,681.98% | -46,065.51% |
Dividends
CURLF vs. GTBIF - Dividend Comparison
Neither CURLF nor GTBIF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CURLF vs. GTBIF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and Green Thumb Industries Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CURLF vs. GTBIF - Profitability Comparison
CURLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 121.91M and revenue of 319.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.
GTBIF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a gross profit of 143.65M and revenue of 300.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.9%.
CURLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 742.57K and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.
GTBIF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported an operating income of 40.73M and revenue of 300.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.
CURLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 68.83M and revenue of 319.74M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.
GTBIF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Green Thumb Industries Inc reported a net income of 15.40M and revenue of 300.19M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CURLF and GTBIF have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CURLF and GTBIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer