CRK vs. OIH
CRK (Comstock Resources, Inc.) is a stock, while OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, CRK returned 16.96%/yr vs -1.73%/yr for OIH. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CRK vs. OIH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRK achieves a -42.80% return, which is significantly lower than OIH's 35.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CRK has outperformed OIH with an annualized return of 16.96%, while OIH has yielded a comparatively lower -1.73% annualized return.
CRK
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -45.54%
- YTD
- -42.80%
- 1Y
- -19.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.96%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.50%
OIH
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 35.13%
- 1Y
- 66.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- 16.72%
- 10Y*
- -1.73%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $34.07M | $34.06M | $38.78M | |
| $98.54M | $112.94M | $141.52M |
CRK vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | -42.80% | 27.22% | 105.88% | -32.37% | 70.63% | 85.13% | -46.90% | 81.68% | -46.45% | -14.11% |
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 35.13% | 6.81% | -10.53% | 3.20% | 66.17% | 21.22% | -41.19% | -3.54% | -45.03% | -19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRK and OIH is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2001 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CRK and OIH has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRK vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank
CRK
OIH
CRK vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRK | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.93 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 9.02 | -9.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRK vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRK drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than OIH's maximum drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRK and OIH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRK | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.32% | -94.45% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.77% | -20.78% | -33.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.73% | -43.80% | -15.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.25% | -43.80% | -20.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.63% | -89.62% | +20.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.59% | -65.73% | -30.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.75% | -48.94% | -13.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.09% | 6.76% | +23.33% |
Volatility
CRK vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison
Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) has a higher volatility of 13.76% compared to VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) at 7.91%. This indicates that CRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRK | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.76% | 7.91% | +5.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.19% | 20.95% | +18.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.79% | 29.63% | +27.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.21% | 36.46% | +21.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.05% | 42.30% | +24.75% |
Dividends
CRK vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison
CRK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.65% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 1.27% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRK and OIH have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRK has higher volatility (13.76%) compared to OIH (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRK dropped -99.32% vs OIH's -94.45%.
OIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRK and OIH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer