OIH vs. XES
OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) and XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - OIH tracks the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index while XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OIH returned -2.32%/yr vs -3.65%/yr for XES. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
OIH vs. XES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 35.03% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 39.22% return. Over the past 10 years, OIH has outperformed XES with an annualized return of -2.32%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -3.65% annualized return.
OIH
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- YTD
- 35.03%
- 6M
- 35.52%
- 1Y
- 68.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- -2.32%
XES
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -12.19%
- YTD
- 39.22%
- 6M
- 40.00%
- 1Y
- 79.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.65%
OIH vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 35.03% | 6.81% | -10.53% | 3.20% | 66.17% | 21.22% | -41.19% | -3.54% | -45.03% | -19.66% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 39.22% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between OIH and XES is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.97 |
The correlation between OIH and XES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
OIH vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OIH
XES
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
OIH
XES
Utilities
OIH
XES
-
Basic Materials
OIH
-
XES
-
Communication Services
OIH
-
XES
-
Consumer Cyclical
OIH
-
XES
-
Consumer Defensive
OIH
-
XES
-
Financial Services
OIH
-
XES
-
Healthcare
OIH
-
XES
-
Industrials
OIH
-
XES
Real Estate
OIH
-
XES
-
Technology
OIH
-
XES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OIH vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank
OIH
XES
OIH vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OIH | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 5.32 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.04 | 18.76 | -2.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OIH vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, roughly equal to the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and XES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OIH | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.45% | -95.65% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.29% | -15.03% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.80% | -45.95% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.80% | -45.95% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.62% | -91.23% | +1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.76% | -73.11% | +7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.87% | -54.40% | +5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 4.25% | +0.04% |
Volatility
OIH vs. XES - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) have volatilities of 10.14% and 10.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OIH | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 10.30% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.14% | 20.80% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.39% | 31.19% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.79% | 39.02% | -2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.38% | 44.96% | -2.58% |
OIH vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OIH and XES have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
OIH vs. XES - Dividend Comparison
OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than XES's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 1.27% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.15% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, OIH and XES move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XES has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to OIH (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OIH dropped -94.45% vs XES's -95.65%.
On 10-year performance, OIH leads with -2.32% vs -3.65% for XES. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, OIH has been the lower-risk option at 10.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, OIH has performed better with a -2.32% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OIH and XES have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.15% for XES.
OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OIH and XES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer