CRF vs. SNOY

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) and SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) are both funds - CRF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone, while SNOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, CRF returned 12.90% vs 11.26% for SNOY. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRF charges 1.84%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SNOY.

Performance

CRF vs. SNOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRF achieves a -3.31% return, which is significantly lower than SNOY's 8.61% return.

CRF

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: -3.31%
• 6M: -1.76%
• 1Y: 12.90%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

SNOY

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: 47.92%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 10.04%
• 1Y: 11.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRF vs. SNOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-3.31%	12.46%	22.88%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	8.61%	30.66%	21.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CRF and SNOY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2024	0.31

The correlation between CRF and SNOY shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CRF vs. SNOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 13
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 14
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRF vs. SNOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) and YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRF	SNOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.18	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	0.77	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.10	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	0.20	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.59	0.45	+2.14

CRF vs. SNOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the SNOY Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRF and SNOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRF vs. SNOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRF drawdown since its inception was -80.70%, which is greater than SNOY's maximum drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRF and SNOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRF	SNOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.70%	-50.90%	-29.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-50.90%	+36.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.09%	-11.86%	+6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.31%	-12.69%	-9.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.48%	23.02%	-18.54%

Volatility

CRF vs. SNOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) is 4.16%, while YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that CRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRF	SNOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	33.96%	-29.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.41%	47.65%	-34.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.41%	57.45%	-42.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.07%	51.88%	-26.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.86%	51.88%	-26.02%

CRF vs. SNOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRF has a 1.84% expense ratio, which is higher than SNOY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRF vs. SNOY - Dividend Comparison

CRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.63%, less than SNOY's 70.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	19.63%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	70.30%	84.96%	33.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRF and SNOY in my portfolio?

CRF and SNOY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRF or SNOY?

SNOY has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to CRF (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRF dropped -80.70% vs SNOY's -50.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.