CRDO vs. ALMU
CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) and ALMU (Aeluma, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, CRDO returned 152.76%/yr vs 85.05%/yr for ALMU. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRDO vs. ALMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDO achieves a 84.62% return, which is significantly higher than ALMU's 6.29% return.
CRDO
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- 13.37%
- 6M
- 87.62%
- YTD
- 84.62%
- 1Y
- 172.21%
- 3Y*
- 152.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALMU
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -19.10%
- 6M
- -18.38%
- YTD
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 12.17%
- 3Y*
- 85.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDO vs. ALMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 84.62% | 114.09% | 245.20% | 46.28% | -13.35% |
ALMU Aeluma, Inc | 6.29% | 124.44% | 163.79% | 38.10% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDO and ALMU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
CRDO:
$49.54B
ALMU:
$258.61M
CRDO:
$2.50
ALMU:
-$0.35
CRDO:
37.65
ALMU:
60.15
CRDO:
24.80
ALMU:
7.90
CRDO:
$1.34B
ALMU:
$5.20M
CRDO:
$908.35M
ALMU:
$2.17M
CRDO:
$463.79M
ALMU:
-$6.01M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDO vs. ALMU — Risk / Return Rank
CRDO
ALMU
CRDO vs. ALMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRDO | ALMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.13 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 0.22 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 0.40 | +7.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRDO vs. ALMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDO drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, which is greater than ALMU's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDO and ALMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDO | ALMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.04% | -55.37% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.59% | -55.37% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.05% | -55.37% | -5.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.19% | -42.05% | +29.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.26% | -23.67% | +4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.41% | 30.25% | -7.84% |
Volatility
CRDO vs. ALMU - Volatility Comparison
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a higher volatility of 33.32% compared to Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) at 25.12%. This indicates that CRDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDO | ALMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.32% | 25.12% | +8.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.16% | 94.37% | -24.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.38% | 124.76% | -35.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.11% | 123.13% | -41.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.11% | 123.13% | -41.02% |
Dividends
CRDO vs. ALMU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRDO nor ALMU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRDO vs. ALMU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Aeluma, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDO and ALMU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDO has higher volatility (33.32%) compared to ALMU (25.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDO dropped -62.04% vs ALMU's -55.37%.
CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRDO and ALMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer