CRCT vs. QBTS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRCT (Cricut, Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Computer Hardware industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, CRCT returned -17.24%/yr vs 169.39%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRCT vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCT achieves a -14.44% return, which is significantly lower than QBTS's 14.38% return.

CRCT

• 1D: -5.47%
• 1M: -3.71%
• YTD: -14.44%
• 6M: -13.21%
• 1Y: -24.15%
• 3Y*: -17.24%
• 5Y*: -29.88%
• 10Y*: —

QBTS

• 1D: 2.50%
• 1M: 45.97%
• YTD: 14.38%
• 6M: 32.93%
• 1Y: 74.81%
• 3Y*: 169.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCT vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRCT Cricut, Inc.	-14.44%	7.53%	-6.79%	-20.13%	28.04%
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	14.38%	211.31%	854.44%	-38.88%	-85.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CRCT and QBTS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.13

The correlation between CRCT and QBTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRCT : $882.07M QBTS : $10.99B
EPS CRCT : $0.34 QBTS : -$1.08
PS Ratio CRCT : 1.26 QBTS : 815.42
PB Ratio CRCT : 2.47 QBTS : 9.78
Total Revenue (TTM) CRCT : $705.62M QBTS : $12.44M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRCT : $384.78M QBTS : $8.25M
EBITDA (TTM) CRCT : $108.59M QBTS : -$399.03M

Return for Risk

CRCT vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCT

CRCT Risk / Return Rank: 20
CRCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
CRCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CRCT Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CRCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CRCT Martin Ratio Rank: 26

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 64
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRCT vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRCT	QBTS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	0.70	-1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.62	1.78	-2.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.19	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	1.17	-1.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.77	2.07	-2.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRCT vs. QBTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the QBTS Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRCT and QBTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRCT	QBTS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	0.70	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.27	0.22	-0.49

Drawdowns

CRCT vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCT drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCT and QBTS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRCT	QBTS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.89%	-96.67%	+8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.20%	-71.01%	+26.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-70.72%	-79.17%	+8.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.09%	-33.21%	-51.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.92%	-65.90%	-5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.14%	40.16%	-13.02%

Volatility

CRCT vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) is 15.24%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 39.90%. This indicates that CRCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRCT	QBTS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.24%	39.90%	-24.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.78%	76.91%	-50.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.22%	107.91%	-65.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.58%	151.22%	-86.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.13%	151.22%	-85.09%

Dividends

CRCT vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison

CRCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.89%, while QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRCT Cricut, Inc.	22.89%	27.27%	7.02%	20.49%
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRCT and QBTS in my portfolio?

CRCT and QBTS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRCT or QBTS?

QBTS has higher volatility (39.90%) compared to CRCT (15.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRCT dropped -87.89% vs QBTS's -96.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.