PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRCT vs. IONQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRCT vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCT achieves a -15.26% return, which is significantly lower than IONQ's 52.06% return.


CRCT

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
-15.26%
6M
-16.28%
1Y
-23.67%
3Y*
-17.50%
5Y*
-29.90%
10Y*

IONQ

1D
-4.44%
1M
49.14%
YTD
52.06%
6M
40.25%
1Y
71.39%
3Y*
94.87%
5Y*
46.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCT vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
-15.26%7.53%-6.79%-20.13%-58.04%24.10%
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
52.06%7.42%237.13%259.13%-79.34%58.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CRCT and IONQ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRCT:

$873.57M

IONQ:

$25.33B

EPS

CRCT:

$0.34

IONQ:

$0.86

PE Ratio

CRCT:

12.05

IONQ:

79.15

PS Ratio

CRCT:

1.25

IONQ:

117.20

PB Ratio

CRCT:

2.44

IONQ:

5.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRCT:

$705.62M

IONQ:

$187.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRCT:

$384.78M

IONQ:

$71.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRCT:

$108.59M

IONQ:

$405.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRCT vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCT
CRCT Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CRCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRCT Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CRCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRCT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IONQ
IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRCT vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRCTIONQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.57

0.78

-1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.60

1.70

-2.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.19

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

1.06

-1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.87

1.94

-2.81

CRCT vs. IONQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRCT and IONQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRCTIONQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

0.78

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.47

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

0.42

-0.69

Drawdowns

CRCT vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCT drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, roughly equal to the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCT and IONQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCTIONQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.89%

-90.00%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.20%

-67.61%

+23.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.72%

-67.61%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.89%

-90.00%

+2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.24%

-16.88%

-68.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.93%

-51.03%

-19.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.24%

36.91%

-9.67%

Volatility

CRCT vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) is 14.86%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 30.10%. This indicates that CRCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCTIONQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.86%

30.10%

-15.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.78%

67.00%

-40.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.99%

91.60%

-49.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.58%

100.10%

-35.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.11%

97.40%

-31.29%

Dividends

CRCT vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison

CRCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.11%, while IONQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
23.11%27.27%7.02%20.49%
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CRCT vs. IONQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cricut, Inc. and IonQ, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
159.47M
64.67M
(CRCT) Total Revenue
(IONQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CRCT and IONQ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONQ has higher volatility (30.10%) compared to CRCT (14.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRCT dropped -87.89% vs IONQ's -90.00%.

IONQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRCT and IONQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer