PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRCT vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CRCT and QQQ is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

CRCT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.59%
12.12%
CRCT
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRCT:

0.42

QQQ:

1.38

Sortino Ratio

CRCT:

1.28

QQQ:

1.88

Omega Ratio

CRCT:

1.16

QQQ:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

CRCT:

0.32

QQQ:

1.86

Martin Ratio

CRCT:

1.54

QQQ:

6.43

Ulcer Index

CRCT:

18.29%

QQQ:

3.92%

Daily Std Dev

CRCT:

67.55%

QQQ:

18.27%

Max Drawdown

CRCT:

-87.89%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

CRCT:

-82.31%

QQQ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCT achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 5.50% return.


CRCT

YTD

7.07%

1M

4.71%

6M

7.83%

1Y

26.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

5.50%

1M

3.38%

6M

12.65%

1Y

26.01%

5Y*

18.94%

10Y*

18.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRCT vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRCT is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRCT is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRCT is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRCT is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRCT is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRCT is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRCT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRCT, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.421.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRCT, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.281.88
The chart of Omega ratio for CRCT, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.161.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRCT, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.321.86
The chart of Martin ratio for CRCT, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.546.43
CRCT
QQQ

The current CRCT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRCT and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.42
1.38
CRCT
QQQ

Dividends

CRCT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CRCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than QQQ's 0.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
10.00%8.77%20.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.53%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

CRCT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCT drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCT and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-82.31%
0
CRCT
QQQ

Volatility

CRCT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 4.92%. This indicates that CRCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.64%
4.92%
CRCT
QQQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab