PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTS vs. INFQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QBTS vs. INFQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QBTS

1D
0.56%
1M
-19.75%
6M
-14.80%
YTD
-30.86%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
88.49%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.23%

INFQ

1D
-1.50%
1M
-20.15%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$88.94M$104.77M$230.68M
$359.00M$350.88M$734.73M

QBTS vs. INFQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum Inc
-8.08%
INFQ
Infleqtion, Inc.
-31.02%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTS and INFQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2026

0.71

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QBTS:

$6.64B

INFQ:

$2.14B

EPS

QBTS:

-$1.04

INFQ:

-$0.95

PS Ratio

QBTS:

514.63

INFQ:

44.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

QBTS:

$12.44M

INFQ:

$9.26M

Gross Profit (TTM)

QBTS:

$8.25M

INFQ:

$5.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

QBTS:

-$399.03M

INFQ:

-$13.12M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTS vs. INFQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QBTS
QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

INFQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QBTS vs. INFQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBTSINFQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.12

QBTS vs. INFQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBTS vs. INFQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than INFQ's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and INFQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTSINFQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.67%

-55.56%

-41.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.62%

-50.53%

-9.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.27%

-28.84%

-36.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.79%

Volatility

QBTS vs. INFQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTSINFQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.95%

119.98%

-9.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

149.71%

119.98%

+29.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

149.71%

119.98%

+29.73%

Dividends

QBTS vs. INFQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTS nor INFQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

QBTS vs. INFQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between D-Wave Quantum Inc and Infleqtion, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


QBTS and INFQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTS and INFQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer