QBTS vs. INFQ

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) and INFQ (Infleqtion, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — QBTS in Computer Hardware, INFQ in Software - Infrastructure. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

QBTS vs. INFQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QBTS

• 1D: 7.72%
• 1M: -4.08%
• YTD: -5.58%
• 6M: -7.94%
• 1Y: 57.76%
• 3Y*: 135.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INFQ

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: -7.96%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTS vs. INFQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc	25.52%
INFQ Infleqtion, Inc.	-5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTS and INFQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2026	0.67

Fundamentals

EPS QBTS : -$1.08 INFQ : -$1.09
PS Ratio QBTS : 673.11 INFQ : 53.45
Total Revenue (TTM) QBTS : $12.44M INFQ : $9.26M
Gross Profit (TTM) QBTS : $8.25M INFQ : $5.09M
EBITDA (TTM) QBTS : -$399.03M INFQ : -$13.12M

Return for Risk

QBTS vs. INFQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTS

QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 62
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 57

INFQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTS vs. INFQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Infleqtion, Inc. (INFQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBTS	INFQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.40	—	—

Drawdowns

QBTS vs. INFQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than INFQ's maximum drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and INFQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTS	INFQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.67%	-43.49%	-53.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.86%	-31.91%	-12.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.57%	-23.91%	-41.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBTS	INFQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.49%	124.99%	-15.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	150.94%	124.99%	+25.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	150.94%	124.99%	+25.95%

Dividends

QBTS vs. INFQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTS nor INFQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTS and INFQ in my portfolio?

QBTS and INFQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.