CRCG vs. CIFG
CRCG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRCG charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
CRCG vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCG achieves a -23.54% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 92.34% return.
CRCG
- 1D
- -20.99%
- 1M
- -48.09%
- YTD
- -23.54%
- 6M
- -38.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 94.51%
- YTD
- 92.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCG vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF | -23.54% | -22.85% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 92.34% | -42.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCG and CIFG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCG vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF (CRCG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRCG | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.12 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
CRCG vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCG drawdown since its inception was -93.85%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCG and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCG | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.85% | -71.71% | -22.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.42% | -0.35% | -87.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.37% | -38.01% | -31.36% |
Volatility
CRCG vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCG | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.39% | 203.83% | -5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.39% | 203.83% | -5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.39% | 203.83% | -5.44% |
CRCG vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCG has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCG vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRCG nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCG and CIFG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CRCG.
CRCG and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.78% for CRCG and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for CRCG and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer