CRCD vs. MSFD
CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) and MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. CRCD is actively managed, while MSFD is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRCD charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MSFD.
Performance
CRCD vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCD achieves a -84.31% return, which is significantly lower than MSFD's 24.19% return.
CRCD
- 1D
- 10.68%
- 1M
- 87.15%
- YTD
- -84.31%
- 6M
- -83.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFD
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 24.19%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- -3.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCD vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -84.31% | 38.83% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 24.19% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCD and MSFD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCD vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank
CRCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSFD
CRCD vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRCD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRCD vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, which is greater than MSFD's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and MSFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.95% | -59.90% | -37.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.56% | -43.99% | -48.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.30% | -41.61% | -15.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility
CRCD vs. MSFD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 200.81% | 26.33% | +174.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.81% | 26.27% | +174.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.81% | 26.27% | +174.54% |
CRCD vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFD's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCD vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison
CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 2.52% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCD and MSFD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSFD is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFD is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRCD and 1.06% for MSFD.
Find the right allocation for CRCD and MSFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer