PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRCD vs. CFIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRCD vs. CFIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCD achieves a -84.31% return, which is significantly lower than CFIT's 5.42% return.


CRCD

1D
10.68%
1M
87.15%
YTD
-84.31%
6M
-83.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CFIT

1D
-0.50%
1M
0.79%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.04%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCD vs. CFIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRCD and CFIT is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025

-0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRCD vs. CFIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CFIT
CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRCD vs. CFIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRCDCFITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

CRCD vs. CFIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRCD vs. CFIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, which is greater than CFIT's maximum drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and CFIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCDCFITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.95%

-4.23%

-92.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.56%

-0.78%

-91.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.30%

-1.19%

-56.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

Volatility

CRCD vs. CFIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCDCFITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

200.81%

5.82%

+194.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

200.81%

5.64%

+195.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

200.81%

5.64%

+195.17%

CRCD vs. CFIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRCD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CFIT's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRCD vs. CFIT - Dividend Comparison

CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CFIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRCD and CFIT have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CFIT is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CFIT is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.

CFIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.

CRCD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CFIT is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRCD and 0.71% for CFIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRCD and CFIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer