CRBN vs. SGOV
CRBN (iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRBN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CRBN returned 11.14%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for SGOV. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. CRBN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.
Performance
CRBN vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.52% return.
CRBN
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 27.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- —
CRBN vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF | 11.12% | 21.85% | 19.29% | 22.31% | -19.12% | 18.82% | 28.07% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.52% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRBN and SGOV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020 | -0.02 |
The correlation between CRBN and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.00 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRBN vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
CRBN
SGOV
CRBN vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRBN | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -272.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 195.55 | -194.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 398.20 | -395.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | 4,462.00 | -4,449.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRBN | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 20.28 | -18.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 14.74 | -14.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 12.49 | -11.79 |
Drawdowns
CRBN vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRBN | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -0.03% | -33.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -0.01% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -0.01% | -16.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -0.03% | -27.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | 0.00% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -0.00% | -5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 0.00% | +2.28% |
Volatility
CRBN vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that CRBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRBN | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 0.05% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.52% | 0.13% | +10.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 0.20% | +12.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 0.24% | +15.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 0.24% | +16.66% |
CRBN vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CRBN vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than SGOV's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.94% | 2.01% | 1.95% | 1.57% | 1.41% | 2.27% | 2.51% | 2.05% | 2.27% | 2.01% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.86% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRBN and SGOV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRBN has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRBN dropped -33.13% vs SGOV's -0.03%.
On 5-year performance, CRBN leads with 11.14% vs 3.54% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CRBN has performed better with a 11.14% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CRBN.
SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 1.99% for CRBN.
CRBN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. CRBN tracks MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRBN and 0.09% for SGOV.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRBN and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer