CQTM vs. TRUT

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.

Performance

CQTM vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CQTM

• 1D: -11.30%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRUT

• 1D: -5.65%
• 1M: 4.10%
• YTD: 16.57%
• 6M: 14.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	2.09%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CQTM and TRUT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026	0.59

Return for Risk

CQTM vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CQTM	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.67	-1.39

Drawdowns

CQTM vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, roughly equal to the maximum TRUT drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and TRUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQTM	TRUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.89%	-18.55%	+0.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.89%	-8.33%	-9.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-5.17%	+0.25%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CQTM	TRUT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	101.00%	22.47%	+78.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.00%	22.47%	+78.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.00%	22.47%	+78.53%

CQTM vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

CQTM vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

CQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

Position	TTM	2025
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.20%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CQTM and TRUT in my portfolio?

CQTM and TRUT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CQTM or TRUT?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CQTM or TRUT?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CQTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CQTM or TRUT?

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for CQTM.

What is the main difference between CQTM and TRUT?

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.13% for TRUT.