CQTM vs. TIME
CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.
Performance
CQTM vs. TIME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CQTM
- 1D
- -11.30%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIME
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 6.69%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- 1Y
- 21.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CQTM vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 2.09% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | -0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQTM and TIME is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQTM vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank
CQTM
TIME
CQTM vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CQTM | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.70 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
CQTM vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum TIME drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and TIME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQTM | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -24.26% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.89% | -3.57% | -14.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -5.59% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.55% | — |
Volatility
CQTM vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQTM | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.00% | 13.59% | +87.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.00% | 17.72% | +83.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.00% | 17.72% | +83.28% |
CQTM vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison
CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CQTM vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison
CQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.39% | 10.02% | 15.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CQTM and TIME have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.
TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.39%, compared with 0.00% for CQTM.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 1.00% for TIME.
Find the right allocation for CQTM and TIME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer