PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQTM vs. TIME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CQTM vs. TIME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CQTM

1D
-11.30%
1M
2.09%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TIME

1D
-2.95%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
6.69%
6M
7.13%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CQTM and TIME is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQTM vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQTM

TIME
TIME Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQTM vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CQTM vs. TIME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CQTMTIMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.70

-0.42

Drawdowns

CQTM vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum TIME drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and TIME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQTMTIMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-24.26%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.89%

-3.57%

-14.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-5.59%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

Volatility

CQTM vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQTMTIMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.00%

13.59%

+87.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.00%

17.72%

+83.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.00%

17.72%

+83.28%

CQTM vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CQTM vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison

CQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%.


PositionTTM20252024
CQTM
Corgi Quantum Computing ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIME
Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF
9.39%10.02%15.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


CQTM and TIME have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.39%, compared with 0.00% for CQTM.

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 1.00% for TIME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQTM and TIME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer