CPT vs. VTR
CPT (Camden Property Trust) and VTR (Ventas, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CPT in REIT - Residential, VTR in REIT - Healthcare Facilities. Over the past 10 years, CPT returned 7.60%/yr vs 6.45%/yr for VTR. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CPT vs. VTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPT achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than VTR's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CPT has outperformed VTR with an annualized return of 7.60%, while VTR has yielded a comparatively lower 6.45% annualized return.
CPT
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
VTR
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -6.36%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 36.42%
- 3Y*
- 26.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
CPT vs. VTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPT Camden Property Trust | 5.60% | -1.48% | 21.31% | -7.64% | -35.58% | 83.40% | -2.28% | 24.21% | -0.98% | 13.33% |
VTR Ventas, Inc. | 10.03% | 35.09% | 22.24% | 15.06% | -8.53% | 7.73% | -9.80% | 3.42% | 3.45% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPT and VTR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1998 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CPT and VTR has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CPT:
$12.06B
VTR:
$41.18B
CPT:
$3.60
VTR:
$0.55
CPT:
31.96
VTR:
153.49
CPT:
0.90
VTR:
4.39
CPT:
10.48
VTR:
6.52
CPT:
2.99
VTR:
3.14
CPT:
$1.18B
VTR:
$6.13B
CPT:
$725.73M
VTR:
-$261.17M
CPT:
$1.12B
VTR:
$2.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPT vs. VTR — Risk / Return Rank
CPT
VTR
CPT vs. VTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPT | VTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.36 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 2.92 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | 11.03 | -10.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPT vs. VTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum VTR drawdown of -83.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and VTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPT | VTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -83.84% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.81% | -12.52% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -19.35% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.22% | -41.80% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.22% | -76.92% | +26.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | -6.36% | -18.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -18.38% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 3.31% | +5.27% |
Volatility
CPT vs. VTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Camden Property Trust (CPT) is 5.55%, while Ventas, Inc. (VTR) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that CPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPT | VTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 8.80% | -3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.28% | 14.88% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 19.35% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 25.02% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 34.78% | -10.41% |
Dividends
CPT vs. VTR - Dividend Comparison
CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than VTR's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPT Camden Property Trust | 3.66% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.03% | 3.36% | 1.93% | 3.32% | 3.02% | 3.50% | 3.26% | 8.62% | 3.65% |
VTR Ventas, Inc. | 2.32% | 2.48% | 3.06% | 3.61% | 4.00% | 3.52% | 4.37% | 5.49% | 5.40% | 5.19% | 4.74% | 20.47% |
Financials
CPT vs. VTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and Ventas, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CPT and VTR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTR has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to CPT (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPT dropped -75.31% vs VTR's -83.84%.
VTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPT and VTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer