PortfoliosLab logo
CPT vs. REG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CPT and REG is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CPT vs. REG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CPT:

0.60

REG:

1.25

Sortino Ratio

CPT:

1.05

REG:

1.86

Omega Ratio

CPT:

1.13

REG:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

CPT:

0.36

REG:

1.53

Martin Ratio

CPT:

2.54

REG:

6.40

Ulcer Index

CPT:

5.71%

REG:

4.10%

Daily Std Dev

CPT:

21.96%

REG:

19.88%

Max Drawdown

CPT:

-75.31%

REG:

-73.38%

Current Drawdown

CPT:

-25.97%

REG:

-5.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPT:

$12.37B

REG:

$13.26B

EPS

CPT:

$1.09

REG:

$2.11

PE Ratio

CPT:

106.18

REG:

34.40

PEG Ratio

CPT:

8.96

REG:

2.98

PS Ratio

CPT:

7.92

REG:

8.70

PB Ratio

CPT:

2.71

REG:

2.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPT:

$1.55B

REG:

$1.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPT:

$950.33M

REG:

$734.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

CPT:

$845.96M

REG:

$1.08B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPT achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly higher than REG's -0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CPT has outperformed REG with an annualized return of 8.75%, while REG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.86% annualized return.


CPT

YTD

2.56%

1M

5.97%

6M

-0.25%

1Y

13.15%

5Y*

10.72%

10Y*

8.75%

REG

YTD

-0.86%

1M

3.17%

6M

0.44%

1Y

24.67%

5Y*

19.20%

10Y*

4.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPT vs. REG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPT is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPT is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPT is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPT is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPT is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPT is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

REG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of REG is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of REG is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of REG is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of REG is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of REG is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of REG is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CPT vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CPT Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the REG Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPT and REG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CPT vs. REG - Dividend Comparison

CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than REG's 3.79% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.51%3.55%4.03%3.36%1.86%3.32%3.02%3.50%3.26%8.62%3.65%3.58%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.79%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%2.95%

Drawdowns

CPT vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, roughly equal to the maximum REG drawdown of -73.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and REG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CPT vs. REG - Volatility Comparison

Camden Property Trust (CPT) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 4.61%. This indicates that CPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CPT vs. REG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and Regency Centers Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M20212022202320242025
390.57M
380.76M
(CPT) Total Revenue
(REG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CPT vs. REG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Camden Property Trust and Regency Centers Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
61.6%
44.7%
(CPT) Gross Margin
(REG) Gross Margin
CPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Camden Property Trust reported a gross profit of 240.58M and revenue of 390.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

REG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 170.09M and revenue of 380.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

CPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Camden Property Trust reported an operating income of 75.11M and revenue of 390.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

REG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 145.67M and revenue of 380.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.

CPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Camden Property Trust reported a net income of 38.82M and revenue of 390.57M, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

REG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 109.59M and revenue of 380.76M, resulting in a net margin of 28.8%.