PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CPT vs. REG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CPTREG
YTD Return26.16%14.30%
1Y Return45.28%30.26%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.15%4.45%
5Y Return (Ann)5.47%7.07%
10Y Return (Ann)8.98%5.68%
Sharpe Ratio2.011.47
Sortino Ratio2.942.20
Omega Ratio1.341.25
Calmar Ratio0.911.41
Martin Ratio11.573.81
Ulcer Index3.80%7.24%
Daily Std Dev21.91%18.80%
Max Drawdown-75.31%-73.38%
Current Drawdown-24.93%-0.71%

Fundamentals


CPTREG
Market Cap$12.99B$13.56B
EPS$3.25$2.12
PE Ratio37.4635.02
PEG Ratio8.964.86
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.77B$1.44B
Gross Profit (TTM)$591.47M$713.17M
EBITDA (TTM)$813.26M$909.45M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CPT and REG is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CPT vs. REG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CPT achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than REG's 14.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CPT has outperformed REG with an annualized return of 8.98%, while REG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.68% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%2,200.00%2,400.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2,329.79%
1,889.55%
CPT
REG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPT vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CPT, currently valued at 2.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.01
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CPT, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CPT, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CPT, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.91
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CPT, currently valued at 11.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.57
REG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for REG, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.20
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for REG, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for REG, currently valued at 3.81, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.81

CPT vs. REG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the REG Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPT and REG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.01
1.47
CPT
REG

Dividends

CPT vs. REG - Dividend Comparison

CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than REG's 3.61% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.36%4.03%3.36%1.86%3.32%3.02%3.50%3.26%8.62%3.65%3.58%4.43%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.61%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%2.95%4.00%

Drawdowns

CPT vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, roughly equal to the maximum REG drawdown of -73.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and REG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-24.93%
-0.71%
CPT
REG

Volatility

CPT vs. REG - Volatility Comparison

Camden Property Trust (CPT) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 4.22%. This indicates that CPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.11%
4.22%
CPT
REG

Financials

CPT vs. REG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and Regency Centers Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items