PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPT vs. REG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CPT vs. REG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPT achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than REG's 14.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CPT has outperformed REG with an annualized return of 6.68%, while REG has yielded a comparatively lower 3.83% annualized return.


CPT

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.41%
YTD
0.09%
6M
1.52%
1Y
-1.86%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
-0.90%
10Y*
6.68%

REG

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
14.23%
6M
14.10%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
3.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPT vs. REG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPT
Camden Property Trust
0.09%-1.48%21.31%-7.64%-35.58%83.40%-2.28%24.21%-0.98%13.33%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
14.23%-2.78%14.90%11.85%-13.59%71.41%-23.86%11.43%-12.00%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CPT and REG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1993

0.58

The correlation between CPT and REG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPT:

$11.43B

REG:

$14.19B

EPS

CPT:

$3.60

REG:

$3.55

PE Ratio

CPT:

30.29

REG:

21.79

PEG Ratio

CPT:

0.85

REG:

2.13

PS Ratio

CPT:

9.94

REG:

8.31

PB Ratio

CPT:

2.84

REG:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPT:

$1.18B

REG:

$1.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPT:

$725.73M

REG:

$814.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

CPT:

$1.12B

REG:

$1.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPT vs. REG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPT
CPT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

REG
REG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPT vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPTREGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.15

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

1.62

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

3.92

-4.17

CPT vs. REG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the REG Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPT and REG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPT vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, roughly equal to the maximum REG drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and REG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPTREGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.31%

-73.37%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-8.17%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-15.10%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.22%

-30.09%

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.22%

-57.02%

+6.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.83%

-3.73%

-25.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-16.16%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.41%

3.38%

+4.03%

Volatility

CPT vs. REG - Volatility Comparison

Camden Property Trust (CPT) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 4.85%. This indicates that CPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPTREGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

4.85%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

11.09%

+3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

16.07%

+3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

22.34%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.40%

29.90%

-5.50%

Dividends

CPT vs. REG - Dividend Comparison

CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, which matches REG's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.86%3.82%3.55%4.03%3.36%1.93%3.32%3.02%3.50%3.26%8.62%3.65%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.84%4.16%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%

Financials

CPT vs. REG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and Regency Centers Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M202220232024202520260
413.42M
(CPT) Total Revenue
(REG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CPT and REG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPT has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to REG (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPT dropped -75.31% vs REG's -73.37%.

REG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPT and REG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer