PortfoliosLab logo
CPT vs. IRM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CPT and IRM is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CPT vs. IRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CPT:

0.72

IRM:

0.80

Sortino Ratio

CPT:

1.27

IRM:

1.26

Omega Ratio

CPT:

1.16

IRM:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

CPT:

0.46

IRM:

0.75

Martin Ratio

CPT:

3.22

IRM:

1.73

Ulcer Index

CPT:

5.67%

IRM:

16.88%

Daily Std Dev

CPT:

21.83%

IRM:

33.19%

Max Drawdown

CPT:

-75.31%

IRM:

-55.71%

Current Drawdown

CPT:

-25.37%

IRM:

-22.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CPT:

$12.60B

IRM:

$28.64B

EPS

CPT:

$1.09

IRM:

$0.41

PE Ratio

CPT:

108.24

IRM:

236.76

PEG Ratio

CPT:

8.96

IRM:

1.08

PS Ratio

CPT:

8.07

IRM:

4.57

PB Ratio

CPT:

2.73

IRM:

1.52K

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPT:

$1.56B

IRM:

$6.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPT:

$674.30M

IRM:

$3.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPT:

$845.36M

IRM:

$2.40B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPT achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly higher than IRM's -5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CPT has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of 8.74%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.02% annualized return.


CPT

YTD

3.40%

1M

10.21%

6M

-0.75%

1Y

15.53%

5Y*

10.89%

10Y*

8.74%

IRM

YTD

-5.97%

1M

17.38%

6M

-15.30%

1Y

26.40%

5Y*

41.07%

10Y*

17.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CPT vs. IRM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPT is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPT is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPT is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPT is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPT is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPT is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IRM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IRM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IRM is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IRM is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IRM is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IRM is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IRM is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CPT vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CPT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the IRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPT and IRM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CPT vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison

CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than IRM's 2.93% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.48%3.55%4.03%3.36%1.86%3.32%3.02%3.50%3.26%8.62%3.65%3.58%
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
2.93%3.34%3.63%4.97%4.73%8.40%7.69%7.33%5.93%6.17%7.07%6.05%

Drawdowns

CPT vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and IRM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CPT vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison

Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) have volatilities of 7.17% and 7.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CPT vs. IRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20212022202320242025
390.57M
1.59B
(CPT) Total Revenue
(IRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CPT vs. IRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Camden Property Trust and Iron Mountain Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
64.3%
55.4%
(CPT) Gross Margin
(IRM) Gross Margin
CPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Camden Property Trust reported a gross profit of 251.15M and revenue of 390.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.3%.

IRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 882.33M and revenue of 1.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

CPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Camden Property Trust reported an operating income of 71.42M and revenue of 390.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.

IRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 254.29M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

CPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Camden Property Trust reported a net income of 38.82M and revenue of 390.57M, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

IRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 15.95M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.