CPT vs. IRM
Compare and contrast key facts about Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM).
Performance
CPT vs. IRM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CPT vs. IRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPT Camden Property Trust | -10.31% | -1.48% | 21.31% | -7.64% | -35.58% | 83.40% | -2.28% | 24.21% | -0.98% | 13.33% |
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 24.14% | -18.24% | 54.48% | 46.52% | -0.08% | 87.74% | 0.98% | 5.87% | -7.97% | 23.56% |
Fundamentals
CPT:
$10.61B
IRM:
$30.48B
CPT:
$3.53
IRM:
$0.49
CPT:
27.65
IRM:
209.97
CPT:
8.99
IRM:
4.40
CPT:
$1.18B
IRM:
$6.90B
CPT:
$723.23M
IRM:
$3.82B
CPT:
$1.11B
IRM:
$2.20B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPT achieves a -10.31% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 24.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CPT has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of 5.60%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.42% annualized return.
CPT
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -8.87%
- YTD
- -10.31%
- 6M
- -6.61%
- 1Y
- -16.88%
- 3Y*
- 1.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
IRM
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- 24.14%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 22.87%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 27.35%
- 10Y*
- 18.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPT vs. IRM — Risk / Return Rank
CPT
IRM
CPT vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPT | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | 0.70 | -1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | 1.15 | -2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.15 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 0.96 | -1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 2.32 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPT | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 0.70 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.94 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.63 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.48 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between CPT and IRM is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CPT vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison
CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than IRM's 3.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPT Camden Property Trust | 4.31% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.03% | 3.36% | 1.93% | 3.32% | 3.02% | 3.50% | 3.26% | 8.62% | 3.65% |
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 3.23% | 3.88% | 2.60% | 3.63% | 4.96% | 4.73% | 8.39% | 7.69% | 7.32% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% |
Drawdowns
CPT vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and IRM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPT | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -55.71% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.00% | -25.15% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.22% | -39.03% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.22% | -39.03% | -11.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.22% | -16.21% | -20.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | -13.21% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.82% | 10.47% | +0.35% |
Volatility
CPT vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Camden Property Trust (CPT) is 4.67%, while Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that CPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPT | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 9.03% | -4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 23.37% | -9.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 32.70% | -10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 29.32% | -6.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 29.31% | -4.98% |
Financials
CPT vs. IRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities