PortfoliosLab logo
VTR vs. FRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between VTR and FRT is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

VTR vs. FRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VTR:

1.73

FRT:

0.02

Sortino Ratio

VTR:

2.44

FRT:

0.14

Omega Ratio

VTR:

1.34

FRT:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

VTR:

1.77

FRT:

-0.01

Martin Ratio

VTR:

7.96

FRT:

-0.04

Ulcer Index

VTR:

5.16%

FRT:

9.05%

Daily Std Dev

VTR:

22.71%

FRT:

23.27%

Max Drawdown

VTR:

-83.35%

FRT:

-57.42%

Current Drawdown

VTR:

-6.35%

FRT:

-19.94%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VTR:

$29.62B

FRT:

$8.51B

EPS

VTR:

$0.33

FRT:

$3.48

PE Ratio

VTR:

198.88

FRT:

28.15

PEG Ratio

VTR:

1.77

FRT:

3.59

PS Ratio

VTR:

5.86

FRT:

6.95

PB Ratio

VTR:

2.55

FRT:

2.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

VTR:

$5.08B

FRT:

$1.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VTR:

$1.86B

FRT:

$734.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

VTR:

$1.94B

FRT:

$824.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTR achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly higher than FRT's -10.63% return. Over the past 10 years, VTR has outperformed FRT with an annualized return of 5.51%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively lower 0.36% annualized return.


VTR

YTD

12.23%

1M

-3.39%

6M

4.72%

1Y

38.35%

5Y*

19.62%

10Y*

5.51%

FRT

YTD

-10.63%

1M

4.51%

6M

-11.88%

1Y

-0.21%

5Y*

8.99%

10Y*

0.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VTR vs. FRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VTR is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VTR is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VTR is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VTR is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VTR is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VTR is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRT is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRT is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRT is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRT is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRT is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRT is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VTR vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the FRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTR and FRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

VTR vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison

VTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than FRT's 4.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.79%3.06%3.61%4.00%3.52%4.37%5.49%5.40%5.19%4.74%5.04%4.15%
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
4.48%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%

Drawdowns

VTR vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTR drawdown since its inception was -83.35%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTR and FRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

VTR vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison

Ventas, Inc. (VTR) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 7.53%. This indicates that VTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

VTR vs. FRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ventas, Inc. and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
1.36B
309.15M
(VTR) Total Revenue
(FRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VTR vs. FRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ventas, Inc. and Federal Realty Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
42.2%
66.2%
(VTR) Gross Margin
(FRT) Gross Margin
VTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ventas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 572.37M and revenue of 1.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.2%.

FRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 204.78M and revenue of 309.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.2%.

VTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ventas, Inc. reported an operating income of 197.69M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

FRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported an operating income of 108.13M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

VTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ventas, Inc. reported a net income of 46.87M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

FRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a net income of 63.77M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.