PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VTR vs. FRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


VTRFRT
YTD Return32.75%14.19%
1Y Return49.97%25.54%
3Y Return (Ann)9.74%0.37%
5Y Return (Ann)6.41%1.29%
10Y Return (Ann)6.61%2.17%
Sharpe Ratio2.581.64
Sortino Ratio3.482.37
Omega Ratio1.441.29
Calmar Ratio1.751.03
Martin Ratio7.868.91
Ulcer Index7.15%3.42%
Daily Std Dev21.76%18.62%
Max Drawdown-83.92%-57.42%
Current Drawdown-3.05%-8.72%

Fundamentals


VTRFRT
Market Cap$27.04B$9.73B
EPS-$0.14$3.43
PEG Ratio2.284.12
Total Revenue (TTM)$4.80B$1.18B
Gross Profit (TTM)$995.70M$712.23M
EBITDA (TTM)$1.70B$753.93M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between VTR and FRT is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

VTR vs. FRT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, VTR achieves a 32.75% return, which is significantly higher than FRT's 14.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VTR has outperformed FRT with an annualized return of 6.61%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.17% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
34.43%
13.05%
VTR
FRT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VTR vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VTR, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.58
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VTR, currently valued at 3.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VTR, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VTR, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.75
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VTR, currently valued at 7.86, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.86
FRT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRT, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRT, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRT, currently valued at 8.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.91

VTR vs. FRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the FRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTR and FRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.58
1.64
VTR
FRT

Dividends

VTR vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison

VTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than FRT's 3.83% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.79%3.61%4.00%3.52%4.36%5.49%5.40%5.19%4.74%13,693.53%23,088.62%26,660.61%
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3.83%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%2.98%

Drawdowns

VTR vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTR drawdown since its inception was -83.92%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTR and FRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.05%
-8.72%
VTR
FRT

Volatility

VTR vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison

Ventas, Inc. (VTR) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 5.01%. This indicates that VTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.68%
5.01%
VTR
FRT

Financials

VTR vs. FRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ventas, Inc. and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items