PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPT vs. ESS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CPT vs. ESS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPT achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than ESS's 10.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CPT has outperformed ESS with an annualized return of 7.60%, while ESS has yielded a comparatively lower 6.41% annualized return.


CPT

1D
0.47%
1M
12.08%
YTD
5.60%
6M
12.64%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
7.60%

ESS

1D
1.13%
1M
6.25%
YTD
10.69%
6M
12.44%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
1.56%
10Y*
6.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPT vs. ESS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPT
Camden Property Trust
5.60%-1.48%21.31%-7.64%-35.58%83.40%-2.28%24.21%-0.98%13.33%
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
10.69%-4.98%18.36%21.97%-37.76%52.40%-18.09%25.92%4.83%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CPT and ESS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 1994

0.66

The correlation between CPT and ESS shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CPT:

$3.60

ESS:

$9.59

PE Ratio

CPT:

31.96

ESS:

29.59

PEG Ratio

CPT:

0.90

ESS:

2.07

PS Ratio

CPT:

10.48

ESS:

7.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

CPT:

$1.18B

ESS:

$1.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CPT:

$725.73M

ESS:

$1.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

CPT:

$1.12B

ESS:

$1.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPT vs. ESS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPT
CPT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ESS
ESS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ESS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ESS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPT vs. ESS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPTESSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.03

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.11

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

0.19

-0.05

CPT vs. ESS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPT Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the ESS Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPT and ESS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPT vs. ESS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than ESS's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and ESS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPTESSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.31%

-62.67%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-16.49%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-20.77%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.22%

-43.87%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.22%

-44.84%

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-7.93%

-16.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-10.86%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.58%

9.80%

-1.22%

Volatility

CPT vs. ESS - Volatility Comparison

Camden Property Trust (CPT) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) at 4.92%. This indicates that CPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPTESSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

4.92%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

14.24%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

20.80%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.69%

23.71%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.37%

25.81%

-1.44%

Dividends

CPT vs. ESS - Dividend Comparison

CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, which matches ESS's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.66%3.82%3.55%4.03%3.36%1.93%3.32%3.02%3.50%3.26%8.62%3.65%
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
3.63%3.88%2.57%3.73%4.15%2.37%3.50%2.59%3.03%2.90%2.75%2.41%

Financials

CPT vs. ESS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and Essex Property Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M202220232024202520260
484.76M
(CPT) Total Revenue
(ESS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CPT and ESS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPT has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to ESS (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPT dropped -75.31% vs ESS's -62.67%.

ESS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPT and ESS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer