ESS vs. CLPR
ESS (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) and CLPR (Clipper Realty Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — ESS in REIT - Residential, CLPR in REIT - Diversified. Over the past 5 years, ESS returned 1.46%/yr vs -10.33%/yr for CLPR. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESS vs. CLPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESS achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly higher than CLPR's -15.22% return.
ESS
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 1.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
CLPR
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- -15.22%
- 6M
- -3.33%
- 1Y
- -10.96%
- 3Y*
- -11.01%
- 5Y*
- -10.33%
- 10Y*
- —
ESS vs. CLPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESS Essex Property Trust, Inc. | 7.78% | -4.98% | 18.36% | 21.97% | -37.76% | 52.40% | -18.09% | 25.92% | 4.83% | 9.63% |
CLPR Clipper Realty Inc. | -15.22% | -8.03% | -7.85% | -9.54% | -32.70% | 47.69% | -29.45% | -16.70% | 35.58% | -31.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESS and CLPR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
ESS:
$9.59
CLPR:
-$0.43
ESS:
7.00
CLPR:
0.51
ESS:
$1.91B
CLPR:
$151.92M
ESS:
$1.32B
CLPR:
$131.57M
ESS:
$1.44B
CLPR:
$60.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESS vs. CLPR — Risk / Return Rank
ESS
CLPR
ESS vs. CLPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) and Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESS | CLPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.99 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | -0.35 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | -0.59 | +0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESS vs. CLPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESS drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, smaller than the maximum CLPR drawdown of -67.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESS and CLPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESS | CLPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.67% | -67.54% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.49% | -31.33% | +14.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -50.66% | +29.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.87% | -60.72% | +16.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.35% | -64.94% | +54.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -39.59% | +28.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.80% | 18.49% | -8.69% |
Volatility
ESS vs. CLPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) is 5.04%, while Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) has a volatility of 18.07%. This indicates that ESS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESS | CLPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 18.07% | -13.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | 33.06% | -18.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.87% | 44.96% | -24.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.70% | 47.55% | -23.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 46.73% | -20.90% |
Dividends
ESS vs. CLPR - Dividend Comparison
ESS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than CLPR's 12.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLPR Clipper Realty Inc. | 12.50% | 9.95% | 8.30% | 7.04% | 5.94% | 3.82% | 5.39% | 2.69% | 2.91% | 3.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESS Essex Property Trust, Inc. | 3.73% | 3.88% | 2.57% | 3.73% | 4.15% | 2.37% | 3.50% | 2.59% | 3.03% | 2.90% | 2.75% | 2.41% |
Financials
ESS vs. CLPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Clipper Realty Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESS vs. CLPR - Profitability Comparison
ESS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 343.50M and revenue of 484.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.
CLPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clipper Realty Inc. reported a gross profit of 30.42M and revenue of 38.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.
ESS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 155.19M and revenue of 484.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.0%.
CLPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clipper Realty Inc. reported an operating income of 4.40M and revenue of 38.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
ESS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -6.02M and revenue of 484.76M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.
CLPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clipper Realty Inc. reported a net income of -4.24M and revenue of 38.12M, resulting in a net margin of -11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESS and CLPR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLPR has higher volatility (18.07%) compared to ESS (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESS dropped -62.67% vs CLPR's -67.54%.
ESS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESS and CLPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer