CPT vs. EPR
CPT (Camden Property Trust) and EPR (EPR Properties) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CPT in REIT - Residential, EPR in REIT - Retail. Over the past 10 years, CPT returned 7.60%/yr vs 3.90%/yr for EPR. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CPT vs. EPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPT achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than EPR's 23.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CPT has outperformed EPR with an annualized return of 7.60%, while EPR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.90% annualized return.
CPT
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
EPR
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 23.29%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 11.23%
- 3Y*
- 17.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.90%
CPT vs. EPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPT Camden Property Trust | 5.60% | -1.48% | 21.31% | -7.64% | -35.58% | 83.40% | -2.28% | 24.21% | -0.98% | 13.33% |
EPR EPR Properties | 23.29% | 20.52% | -1.25% | 38.83% | -14.61% | 50.60% | -52.09% | 17.13% | 3.59% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPT and EPR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1997 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CPT and EPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CPT:
$12.06B
EPR:
$4.58B
CPT:
$3.60
EPR:
$3.55
CPT:
31.96
EPR:
16.86
CPT:
0.90
EPR:
0.36
CPT:
10.48
EPR:
6.54
CPT:
2.99
EPR:
1.98
CPT:
$1.18B
EPR:
$700.22M
CPT:
$725.73M
EPR:
$568.77M
CPT:
$1.12B
EPR:
$582.57M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPT vs. EPR — Risk / Return Rank
CPT
EPR
CPT vs. EPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camden Property Trust (CPT) and EPR Properties (EPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPT | EPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.10 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 0.58 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | 1.15 | -1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPT vs. EPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPT drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum EPR drawdown of -82.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPT and EPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPT | EPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -82.02% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.81% | -19.51% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -19.51% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.22% | -35.63% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.22% | -82.02% | +31.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | 0.00% | -24.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -16.58% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 9.81% | -1.23% |
Volatility
CPT vs. EPR - Volatility Comparison
Camden Property Trust (CPT) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to EPR Properties (EPR) at 5.14%. This indicates that CPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPT | EPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 5.14% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.28% | 16.49% | -2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 22.44% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 26.16% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 42.44% | -18.07% |
Dividends
CPT vs. EPR - Dividend Comparison
CPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than EPR's 5.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPT Camden Property Trust | 3.66% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.03% | 3.36% | 1.93% | 3.32% | 3.02% | 3.50% | 3.26% | 8.62% | 3.65% |
EPR EPR Properties | 5.99% | 7.05% | 7.68% | 6.81% | 8.62% | 3.16% | 4.66% | 6.37% | 5.62% | 6.23% | 5.35% | 6.21% |
Financials
CPT vs. EPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camden Property Trust and EPR Properties. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CPT and EPR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPT has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to EPR (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPT dropped -75.31% vs EPR's -82.02%.
EPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPT and EPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer