CPSL vs. CANQ
CPSL (Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF) and CANQ (Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — CPSL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while CANQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CPSL returned 9.02% vs 16.07% for CANQ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPSL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for CANQ.
Performance
CPSL vs. CANQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPSL achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than CANQ's -2.24% return.
CPSL
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 9.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANQ
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -1.98%
- 1Y
- 16.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPSL vs. CANQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CPSL Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.27% | 6.43% | 2.32% |
CANQ Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF | -2.24% | 11.69% | 11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPSL and CANQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between CPSL and CANQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPSL vs. CANQ — Risk / Return Rank
CPSL
CANQ
CPSL vs. CANQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) and Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPSL | CANQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.19 | 1.56 | +1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.31 | 2.21 | +3.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.28 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.59 | 1.39 | +5.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.84 | 4.42 | +28.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPSL | CANQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 1.56 | +1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.85 | 1.04 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
CPSL vs. CANQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPSL drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum CANQ drawdown of -12.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSL and CANQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPSL | CANQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -12.79% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.34% | -10.77% | +9.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.93% | +5.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -3.04% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.27% | 3.38% | -3.11% |
Volatility
CPSL vs. CANQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) is 1.13%, while Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that CPSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPSL | CANQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 3.86% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.70% | 8.09% | -6.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 10.40% | -7.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 12.70% | -9.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 12.70% | -9.23% |
CPSL vs. CANQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPSL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CANQ's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPSL vs. CANQ - Dividend Comparison
CPSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CANQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CPSL Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CANQ Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF | 4.79% | 5.02% | 4.19% |