CPK vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CPK (Chesapeake Utilities Corporation) is a stock, while MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, CPK returned 9.42%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for MINT. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CPK vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPK achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CPK has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 9.42%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.70% annualized return.

CPK

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -4.63%
• YTD: -2.81%
• 6M: -7.02%
• 1Y: 0.55%
• 3Y*: -0.36%
• 5Y*: 2.68%
• 10Y*: 9.42%

MINT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPK vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation	-2.81%	5.07%	17.44%	-8.83%	-17.61%	36.78%	15.15%	19.88%	5.37%	19.34%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.81%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-1.01%	-0.03%	1.62%	3.34%	1.72%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CPK and MINT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2009	0.02

Return for Risk

CPK vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPK

CPK Risk / Return Rank: 38
CPK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
CPK Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CPK Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CPK Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CPK Martin Ratio Rank: 41

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPK vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPK	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	17.09	-17.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	65.54	-65.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	20.53	-19.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	94.30	-94.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.09	939.26	-939.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPK vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPK Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPK and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPK	MINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	17.09	-17.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	5.99	-5.87
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	2.87	-2.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	2.47	-2.14

Drawdowns

CPK vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPK drawdown since its inception was -44.54%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPK and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPK	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.54%	-4.62%	-39.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-0.05%	-12.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.53%	-0.16%	-33.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.67%	-2.42%	-36.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.67%	-4.62%	-34.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.33%	0.00%	-12.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-0.17%	-8.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.90%	0.00%	+5.90%

Volatility

CPK vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that CPK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPK	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	0.09%	+5.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	0.20%	+13.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.72%	0.27%	+18.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.78%	0.58%	+22.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.64%	0.95%	+25.69%

Dividends

CPK vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

CPK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than MINT's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corporation	2.27%	2.16%	2.07%	2.18%	1.76%	1.29%	1.59%	1.65%	1.77%	1.63%	1.80%	2.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPK and MINT in my portfolio?

CPK and MINT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPK or MINT?

CPK has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPK dropped -44.54% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.09 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.