CPJ1.L vs. JRCE.L
CPJ1.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) and JRCE.L (JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CPJ1.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while JRCE.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CPJ1.L returned 11.78%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for JRCE.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPJ1.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JRCE.L.
Performance
CPJ1.L vs. JRCE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly lower than JRCE.L's 10,834.19% return.
CPJ1.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 16.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
JRCE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 10,834.19%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPJ1.L vs. JRCE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPJ1.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 10.58% | 12.05% | 6.89% | 0.15% | 6.40% |
JRCE.L JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 10,834.19% | -98.80% | 11.38% | -17.74% | -9.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPJ1.L and JRCE.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPJ1.L vs. JRCE.L — Risk / Return Rank
CPJ1.L
JRCE.L
CPJ1.L vs. JRCE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPJ1.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -261.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 89.15 | -87.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 0.34 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 0.77 | +5.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPJ1.L vs. JRCE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum JRCE.L drawdown of -99.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and JRCE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPJ1.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -99.20% | +66.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -99.05% | +91.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.21% | -99.15% | +77.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -6.79% | +5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -21.04% | +13.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 43.28% | -40.61% |
Volatility
CPJ1.L vs. JRCE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) is 2.28%, while JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that CPJ1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRCE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPJ1.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 8.84% | -6.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 654.26% | -645.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.38% | 25,991.70% | -25,980.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 12,491.07% | -12,471.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 12,491.07% | -12,472.54% |
CPJ1.L vs. JRCE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JRCE.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPJ1.L vs. JRCE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPJ1.L nor JRCE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPJ1.L and JRCE.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CPJ1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CPJ1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JRCE.L.
CPJ1.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while JRCE.L is China Equities. CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while JRCE.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPJ1.L and 0.40% for JRCE.L.
Find the right allocation for CPJ1.L and JRCE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer