JRCE.L vs. CEBG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L).
JRCE.L and CEBG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JRCE.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. CEBG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2021. Both JRCE.L and CEBG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
JRCE.L vs. CEBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JRCE.L vs. CEBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JRCE.L JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 1.10% | 19.75% | 11.38% | -17.74% | -9.39% |
CEBG.L VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -2.72% | 15.45% | 1.26% | -14.25% | -10.95% |
Different Trading Currencies
JRCE.L is traded in GBp, while CEBG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CEBG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JRCE.L achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than CEBG.L's -2.72% return.
JRCE.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBG.L
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- -2.72%
- 6M
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- -2.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JRCE.L vs. CEBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JRCE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CEBG.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JRCE.L vs. CEBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
JRCE.L
CEBG.L
JRCE.L vs. CEBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JRCE.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 0.43 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 0.67 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.09 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 0.61 | +2.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 1.71 | +6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JRCE.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 0.43 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | -0.15 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between JRCE.L and CEBG.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JRCE.L vs. CEBG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JRCE.L nor CEBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
JRCE.L vs. CEBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JRCE.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, smaller than the maximum CEBG.L drawdown of -46.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JRCE.L and CEBG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JRCE.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.68% | -46.41% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.58% | -13.28% | +4.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.10% | -23.36% | +18.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.24% | -24.50% | +6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 4.76% | -1.86% |
Volatility
JRCE.L vs. CEBG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) is 5.06%, while VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that JRCE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JRCE.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 5.64% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 11.62% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 18.33% | -2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 24.60% | -2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 24.60% | -2.93% |