CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L
CPJ1.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc) and ESPS.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CPJ1.L returned 6.01%/yr vs 6.05%/yr for ESPS.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPJ1.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ESPS.L.
Performance
CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than ESPS.L's 6.57% return.
CPJ1.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
ESPS.L
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 14.60%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- —
CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPJ1.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 8.83% | 12.05% | 6.89% | 0.15% | 4.86% | 3.60% |
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 6.57% | 10.52% | 7.35% | 2.26% | 1.34% | 5.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPJ1.L and ESPS.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, CPJ1.L and ESPS.L have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.
CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
Financial Services
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Basic Materials
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Industrials
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Real Estate
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Cyclical
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Utilities
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Healthcare
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Defensive
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Communication Services
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Energy
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Technology
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
CPJ1.L
ESPS.L
CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPJ1.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 1.93 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 5.53 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPJ1.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.34 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.59 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.66 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than ESPS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and ESPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPJ1.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.49% | -17.76% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -7.52% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.15% | -17.76% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.61% | -17.76% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -4.04% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.90% | -4.55% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 2.63% | -0.23% |
Volatility
CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPJ1.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 3.56% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 8.36% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 10.84% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 18.86% | -5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 18.86% | -2.93% |
CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CPJ1.L vs. ESPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPJ1.L nor ESPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CPJ1.L and ESPS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPJ1.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPJ1.L and 0.19% for ESPS.L.
Find the right allocation for CPJ1.L and ESPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer