CPER vs. TAGS
CPER (United States Copper Index Fund) and TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CPER is a Metals fund tracking the SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return, while TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CPER returned 10.91%/yr vs -1.74%/yr for TAGS. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPER charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for TAGS.
Performance
CPER vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPER achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly higher than TAGS's 6.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CPER has outperformed TAGS with an annualized return of 10.91%, while TAGS has yielded a comparatively lower -1.74% annualized return.
CPER
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 12.76%
- 6M
- 19.35%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
TAGS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- -0.95%
- 3Y*
- -7.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.51%
- 10Y*
- -1.74%
CPER vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | 12.76% | 38.95% | 4.23% | 4.55% | -15.14% | 25.21% | 23.90% | 6.66% | -21.91% | 28.80% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 6.11% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPER and TAGS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2012 | 0.13 |
The correlation between CPER and TAGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPER vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank
CPER
TAGS
CPER vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPER | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | -0.08 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | -0.02 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.00 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | -0.09 | +1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.50 | -0.16 | +2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPER | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | -0.08 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | -0.09 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | -0.10 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -0.23 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
CPER vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPER drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPER and TAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPER | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.04% | -76.40% | +22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -10.07% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.77% | -33.59% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.75% | -37.60% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.42% | -47.30% | +8.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -63.69% | +60.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.41% | -57.23% | +31.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.93% | 5.88% | +6.05% |
Volatility
CPER vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) at 5.52%. This indicates that CPER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPER | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.73% | 5.52% | +4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.85% | 10.12% | +12.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.48% | 12.61% | +21.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 16.58% | +10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 18.04% | +6.00% |
CPER vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPER has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPER vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPER nor TAGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPER and TAGS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPER has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to TAGS (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPER dropped -54.04% vs TAGS's -76.40%.
On 10-year performance, CPER leads with 10.91% vs -1.74% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CPER has performed better with a 10.91% return vs -1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for CPER.
CPER and TAGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CPER is categorized as Metals, while TAGS is Agricultural Commodities. CPER tracks SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return, while TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for CPER and 0.21% for TAGS.
CPER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPER and TAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer