CPAG vs. SCHZ
CPAG (F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds - CPAG tracks the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index while SCHZ tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CPAG charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHZ.
Performance
CPAG vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPAG achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCHZ's -0.58% return.
CPAG
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHZ
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 1.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- -0.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $556.82K | $489.32K | $481.87K | |
| $38.45M | $39.28M | $43.87M |
CPAG vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.99% | 2.26% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.58% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPAG and SCHZ is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPAG vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank
CPAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHZ
CPAG vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPAG | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPAG vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPAG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum SCHZ drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAG and SCHZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPAG | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -18.74% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -3.32% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -3.67% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.07% | — |
Volatility
CPAG vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPAG | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 3.70% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 6.09% | -2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 5.42% | -1.71% |
CPAG vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPAG has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPAG vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.82% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, CPAG and SCHZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHZ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.
SCHZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.
CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for CPAG and 0.03% for SCHZ.
Find the right allocation for CPAG and SCHZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer