CPAG vs. BTOT
CPAG (F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and BTOT (iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds - CPAG tracks the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index while BTOT tracks the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CPAG charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BTOT.
Performance
CPAG vs. BTOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPAG achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than BTOT's -0.32% return.
CPAG
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BTOT
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.60K | $46.79K | $74.77K | |
| $556.82K | $489.32K | $481.87K |
CPAG vs. BTOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.99% | 0.01% |
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | -0.32% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPAG and BTOT is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPAG vs. BTOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG) and iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPAG vs. BTOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPAG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, which is greater than BTOT's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAG and BTOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPAG | BTOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -2.36% | -0.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -1.89% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -0.86% | -0.04% |
Volatility
CPAG vs. BTOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPAG | BTOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 3.62% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 3.62% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 3.62% | +0.09% |
CPAG vs. BTOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPAG has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BTOT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPAG vs. BTOT - Dividend Comparison
CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 2.52% | 0.22% |
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, CPAG and BTOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.
BTOT has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.
CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for CPAG and 0.09% for BTOT.
Find the right allocation for CPAG and BTOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer