PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPAG vs. ZMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPAG vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAG achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.77% return.


CPAG

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMUN

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.77%
6M
1.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPAG vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPAG and ZMUN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPAG vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CPAG vs. ZMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPAG vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAG and ZMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPAGZMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-0.10%

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-0.03%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-0.01%

-0.77%

Volatility

CPAG vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPAGZMUNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

0.54%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.71%

0.54%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.71%

0.54%

+3.17%

CPAG vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPAG has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPAG vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPAG and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.

ZMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.

CPAG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while ZMUN is Municipal Bonds. CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for CPAG and 0.30% for ZMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPAG and ZMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer