CPAC vs. PAA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA).
Performance
CPAC vs. PAA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CPAC vs. PAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPAC Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. | -4.03% | 117.33% | 10.95% | 10.54% | -8.94% | -4.24% | -16.22% | 2.81% | -19.45% | 40.23% |
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 27.03% | 14.30% | 21.38% | 39.18% | 35.79% | 22.24% | -50.79% | -2.28% | 2.31% | -31.34% |
Fundamentals
CPAC:
$889.63M
PAA:
$15.76B
CPAC:
$1.76
PAA:
$2.04
CPAC:
5.68
PAA:
10.95
CPAC:
26.03
PAA:
0.21
CPAC:
0.41
PAA:
0.35
CPAC:
0.75
PAA:
1.60
CPAC:
$2.11B
PAA:
$44.80B
CPAC:
$805.40M
PAA:
$2.17B
CPAC:
$454.83M
PAA:
$2.96B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPAC achieves a -4.03% return, which is significantly lower than PAA's 27.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CPAC has outperformed PAA with an annualized return of 10.34%, while PAA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.77% annualized return.
CPAC
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -4.03%
- 6M
- 56.70%
- 1Y
- 88.07%
- 3Y*
- 35.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
PAA
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 27.03%
- 6M
- 36.78%
- 1Y
- 21.75%
- 3Y*
- 31.34%
- 5Y*
- 29.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPAC vs. PAA — Risk / Return Rank
CPAC
PAA
CPAC vs. PAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPAC | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 0.90 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 1.28 | +2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.18 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.75 | 0.98 | +4.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.54 | 2.05 | +19.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPAC | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 0.90 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 1.08 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.21 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.30 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between CPAC and PAA is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CPAC vs. PAA - Dividend Comparison
CPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than PAA's 6.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPAC Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. | 6.02% | 5.78% | 10.37% | 10.51% | 10.22% | 16.01% | 4.28% | 5.76% | 5.56% | 4.01% | 4.12% | 5.12% |
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 6.97% | 8.46% | 7.44% | 7.06% | 7.08% | 7.71% | 10.92% | 7.50% | 5.99% | 9.45% | 8.21% | 11.93% |
Drawdowns
CPAC vs. PAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPAC drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, smaller than the maximum PAA drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAC and PAA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPAC | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.46% | -91.99% | +32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.32% | -20.96% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.79% | -26.11% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.60% | -87.92% | +31.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.39% | -12.09% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.92% | -25.87% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 9.99% | -5.90% |
Volatility
CPAC vs. PAA - Volatility Comparison
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) has a higher volatility of 14.09% compared to Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) at 5.97%. This indicates that CPAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPAC | PAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.09% | 5.97% | +8.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.29% | 11.96% | +36.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.67% | 24.36% | +37.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.46% | 27.11% | +12.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.95% | 42.28% | -4.33% |
Financials
CPAC vs. PAA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CPAC vs. PAA - Profitability Comparison
CPAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. reported a gross profit of 218.46M and revenue of 555.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.3%.
PAA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a gross profit of 712.00M and revenue of 10.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.7%.
CPAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. reported an operating income of 121.38M and revenue of 555.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
PAA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported an operating income of 354.00M and revenue of 10.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
CPAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. reported a net income of -17.68M and revenue of 555.80M, resulting in a net margin of -3.2%.
PAA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a net income of 342.00M and revenue of 10.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.