COYY vs. QDTE
COYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
COYY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -30.27% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 10.44% return.
COYY
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- -27.71%
- YTD
- -30.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $232.11K | $296.06K | $625.97K | |
| $18.22M | $18.56M | $19.43M |
COYY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | -30.27% | -40.04% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 10.44% | 10.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between COYY and QDTE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COYY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
COYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDTE
COYY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COYY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COYY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COYY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.85% | -22.86% | -37.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.94% | -5.41% | -53.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.41% | -3.13% | -35.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility
COYY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COYY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.28% | 17.61% | +16.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.28% | 19.09% | +15.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.28% | 19.09% | +15.19% |
COYY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
COYY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 441.12%, more than QDTE's 47.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | 441.12% | 132.14% | 0.00% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 47.39% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COYY and QDTE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.
COYY has the higher dividend yield at 441.12%, compared with 47.39% for QDTE.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for COYY and 0.97% for QDTE.
Find the right allocation for COYY and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer