COWZ vs. TMVE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - COWZ tracks the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index while TMVE tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.

Performance

COWZ vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 17.39% return.

COWZ

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 15.76%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 9.90%
• 10Y*: —

TMVE

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 3.25%
• YTD: 17.39%
• 6M: 16.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWZ vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	3.27%	3.72%
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF	17.39%	6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and TMVE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

COWZ vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 45
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 39
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

TMVE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWZ vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COWZ	TMVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.92	—	—

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and TMVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	COWZ	TMVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.63%	-8.21%	-30.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.40%	-0.69%	-4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-1.43%	-3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COWZ	TMVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	13.81%	-2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	13.81%	+3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.90%	13.81%	+6.09%

COWZ vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

COWZ vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	2.00%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF	0.10%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COWZ and TMVE in my portfolio?

COWZ and TMVE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COWZ or TMVE?

On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COWZ or TMVE?

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COWZ or TMVE?

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.

What is the main difference between COWZ and TMVE?

COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.55% for TMVE.