PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWZ vs. SFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COWZ vs. SFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COWZ vs. SFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
4.30%8.98%10.64%-0.09%
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
1.98%11.88%6.54%-0.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly higher than SFLO's 1.98% return.


COWZ

1D
1.08%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
4.30%
6M
10.31%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*

SFLO

1D
2.11%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
1.98%
6M
3.58%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COWZ vs. SFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COWZ and SFLO have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Return for Risk

COWZ vs. SFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLO
SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWZ vs. SFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COWZSFLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.99

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.51

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.06

5.91

+0.15

COWZ vs. SFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the SFLO Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWZ and SFLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COWZSFLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.99

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.43

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and SFLO is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

COWZ vs. SFLO - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than SFLO's 0.95% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.06%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
0.95%1.04%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. SFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than SFLO's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and SFLO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COWZSFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.63%

-26.63%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.55%

-16.83%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.36%

-1.89%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-4.59%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.90%

-0.99%

Volatility

COWZ vs. SFLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 3.00%, while Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COWZSFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

4.74%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

12.01%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.50%

23.98%

-6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

20.81%

-3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

20.81%

-0.73%