PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
COWZ vs. KBWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

COWZ vs. KBWP

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) and KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while KBWP is a Financials Equities fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COWZ returned 10.13%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for KBWP. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWP.

Performance

COWZ vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than KBWP's -3.45% return.

COWZ

1D
0.82%
1M
1.75%
YTD
6.93%
6M
6.01%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
—

KBWP

1D
0.54%
1M
3.51%
YTD
-3.45%
6M
-2.31%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWZ vs. KBWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF		6.93%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF		-3.45%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and KBWP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between COWZ and KBWP has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

COWZ vs. KBWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
COWZ
KBWP

Healthcare

21.8%

-

Energy

16.9%

-

Technology

16.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.9%

-

Communication Services

10.4%

-

Industrials

8.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.7%

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

COWZ
21.8%
KBWP

-

Energy

COWZ
16.9%
KBWP

-

Technology

COWZ
16.0%
KBWP

-

Consumer Cyclical

COWZ
11.7%
KBWP

-

Consumer Defensive

COWZ
10.9%
KBWP

-

Communication Services

COWZ
10.4%
KBWP

-

Industrials

COWZ
8.4%
KBWP

-

Basic Materials

COWZ
3.7%
KBWP

-

Financial Services

COWZ

-

KBWP
100.0%

Real Estate

COWZ

-

KBWP

-

Utilities

COWZ

-

KBWP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF

Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF

Often compared with COWZ:
COWZ vs. VOOCOWZ vs. VFLOCOWZ vs. SCHDCOWZ vs. GCOWCOWZ vs. COWGCOWZ vs. CALFCOWZ vs. VOOV
Often compared with KBWP:
KBWP vs. IAKKBWP vs. KIEKBWP vs. KBEKBWP vs. ACGLKBWP vs. PSCFKBWP vs. TRVKBWP vs. VOO

Return for Risk

COWZ vs. KBWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWZ vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

COWZKBWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.63
0.06

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.42
0.20

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.02

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

0.11

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

0.24

+9.49

COWZ vs. KBWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the KBWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWZ and KBWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, roughly equal to the maximum KBWP drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and KBWP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

COWZKBWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.63%

-39.76%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-9.56%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-12.29%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-17.00%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.76%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-4.25%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-4.37%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

4.31%

-2.43%

Volatility

COWZ vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 3.27%, while Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

COWZKBWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

5.73%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

12.10%

-4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

16.50%

-5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.60%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

20.73%

-0.82%

COWZ vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWP's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

COWZ vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, which matches KBWP's 1.92% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF		1.93%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF		1.92%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

COWZ and KBWP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWP has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to COWZ (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs KBWP's -39.76%.

On 5-year performance, KBWP leads with 11.67% vs 10.13% for COWZ. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KBWP has performed better with a 11.67% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.92% for KBWP.

COWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while KBWP is Financials Equities. COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.35% for KBWP.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWZ and KBWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer