COWZ vs. INCO
COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) and INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while INCO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COWZ returned 10.11%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for INCO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for INCO.
Performance
COWZ vs. INCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than INCO's -12.41% return.
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 19.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
INCO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -12.41%
- 6M
- -10.02%
- 1Y
- -12.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
COWZ vs. INCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 6.41% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -12.41% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 34.63% | -7.01% | 19.28% | 14.55% | -4.22% | -10.81% | 53.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWZ and INCO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.36 |
The correlation between COWZ and INCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
COWZ vs. INCO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COWZ
INCO
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
COWZ
INCO
-
Energy
COWZ
INCO
-
Technology
COWZ
INCO
Consumer Cyclical
COWZ
INCO
Consumer Defensive
COWZ
INCO
Communication Services
COWZ
INCO
-
Industrials
COWZ
INCO
Basic Materials
COWZ
INCO
-
Financial Services
COWZ
-
INCO
-
Real Estate
COWZ
-
INCO
-
Utilities
COWZ
-
INCO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWZ vs. INCO — Risk / Return Rank
COWZ
INCO
COWZ vs. INCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWZ | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.89 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | -0.58 | +4.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | -1.46 | +11.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWZ | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | -0.73 | +2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.33 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.42 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
COWZ vs. INCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, smaller than the maximum INCO drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and INCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWZ | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.63% | -47.69% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -21.37% | +16.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -29.98% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | -29.98% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -25.40% | +22.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -10.58% | +5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 8.47% | -6.63% |
Volatility
COWZ vs. INCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 2.92%, while Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWZ | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 5.50% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 14.33% | -7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 16.90% | -5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 16.91% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 20.32% | -0.40% |
COWZ vs. INCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than INCO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
COWZ vs. INCO - Dividend Comparison
COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.94% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWZ and INCO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCO has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to COWZ (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs INCO's -47.69%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.11% vs 5.53% for INCO. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.
COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
COWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while INCO is Asia Pacific Equities. COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.75% for INCO.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWZ and INCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer