COWZ vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COWZ returned 22.23% vs 4.54% for IBIC. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

COWZ vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.

COWZ

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 22.23%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWZ vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	8.18%	8.98%	10.64%	4.08%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.37%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and IBIC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	0.05

Return for Risk

COWZ vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 65

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWZ vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COWZ	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	5.05	-3.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	9.12	-6.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	2.24	-0.89
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	17.27	-12.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.19	67.45	-55.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COWZ vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWZ and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COWZ	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	5.05	-3.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	3.49	-2.84

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	COWZ	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.63%	-0.90%	-37.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.00%	-0.26%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-0.13%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-0.10%	-4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	0.07%	+1.76%

Volatility

COWZ vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that COWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COWZ	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	0.33%	+2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.12%	0.67%	+6.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.13%	0.90%	+10.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.63%	1.58%	+16.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.93%	1.58%	+18.35%

COWZ vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

COWZ vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.99%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COWZ and IBIC in my portfolio?

COWZ and IBIC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COWZ or IBIC?

COWZ has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, COWZ or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, COWZ leads with 22.23% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COWZ or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 22.23% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COWZ or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COWZ or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.99% for COWZ.

What is the main difference between COWZ and IBIC?

COWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.