PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIC vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIC vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIC achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 0.77% return.


IBIC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTP

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.77%
6M
0.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIC vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIC and VTP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIC vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

VTP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIC vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBICVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

58.11

IBIC vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIC vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIC drawdown since its inception was -0.90%, smaller than the maximum VTP drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIC and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBICVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-1.92%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.07%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.52%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

Volatility

IBIC vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBICVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89%

3.35%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.57%

3.35%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.57%

3.35%

-1.78%

IBIC vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIC vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than VTP's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
1.62%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIC and VTP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.62% for VTP.

IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIC and 0.05% for VTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIC and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer