IBIC vs. VTP
IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIC tracks the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIC charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
IBIC vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIC achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 0.77% return.
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTP
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.39% | 1.69% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 0.77% | 2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIC and VTP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIC vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIC
VTP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIC vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIC | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 58.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIC vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIC drawdown since its inception was -0.90%, smaller than the maximum VTP drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIC and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIC | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -1.92% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -1.07% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -0.52% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility
IBIC vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIC | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89% | 3.35% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.57% | 3.35% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.57% | 3.35% | -1.78% |
IBIC vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIC vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than VTP's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.62% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIC and VTP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.62% for VTP.
IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIC and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for IBIC and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer