COWZ vs. AAPL
COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, COWZ returned 10.11%/yr vs 19.46%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COWZ vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 11.12% return.
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 19.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 19.46%
- 10Y*
- 29.63%
COWZ vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 6.41% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 11.12% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWZ and AAPL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.45 |
The correlation between COWZ and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWZ vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
COWZ
AAPL
COWZ vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWZ | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 3.53 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | 8.89 | +1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWZ | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.18 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.71 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.44 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
COWZ vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWZ | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.63% | -81.80% | +43.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -13.80% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -33.36% | +11.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | -33.36% | +11.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -4.33% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -29.60% | +24.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 5.48% | -3.64% |
Volatility
COWZ vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 2.92%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWZ | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 5.68% | -2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 15.99% | -8.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 22.41% | -11.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 27.47% | -9.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 28.91% | -8.99% |
Dividends
COWZ vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than AAPL's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.94% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWZ and AAPL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to COWZ (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWZ and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer