PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWS vs. NIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COWS vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than NIXT's 18.29% return.


COWS

1D
-0.63%
1M
5.01%
YTD
9.22%
6M
9.70%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NIXT

1D
-1.51%
1M
1.69%
YTD
18.29%
6M
17.24%
1Y
33.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWS vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
9.22%15.29%5.70%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
18.29%4.94%4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between COWS and NIXT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.81

The correlation between COWS and NIXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COWS vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWS
COWS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
COWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWS vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COWSNIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

2.87

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

9.69

+4.66

COWS vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWS and NIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COWSNIXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.59

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.71

+0.19

Drawdowns

COWS vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum NIXT drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and NIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COWSNIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.76%

-27.75%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-11.71%

+5.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-2.37%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-5.96%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

3.47%

-1.36%

Volatility

COWS vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) is 4.58%, while Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that COWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COWSNIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

5.00%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

14.08%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

21.24%

-5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

23.31%

-4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

23.31%

-4.46%

COWS vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

COWS vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than NIXT's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
1.60%2.04%2.08%0.67%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.35%1.64%1.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COWS and NIXT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIXT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to COWS (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWS dropped -24.76% vs NIXT's -27.75%.

On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 33.50% vs 30.18% for COWS. On fees, COWS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, COWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 33.50% return vs 30.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for NIXT.

COWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.35% for NIXT.

COWS tracks Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index, while NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Research Affiliates. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for COWS and 0.09% for NIXT.

COWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWS and NIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer