COWS vs. NIXT
COWS (Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF) and NIXT (Research Affiliates Deletions ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - COWS tracks the Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index while NIXT tracks the Research Affiliates Deletions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COWS returned 30.18% vs 33.50% for NIXT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. COWS charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for NIXT.
Performance
COWS vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than NIXT's 18.29% return.
COWS
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 9.22%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIXT
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWS vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 9.22% | 15.29% | 5.70% |
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF | 18.29% | 4.94% | 4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWS and NIXT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between COWS and NIXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWS vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank
COWS
NIXT
COWS vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWS | NIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.59 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 2.34 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.27 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 2.87 | +1.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 9.69 | +4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWS | NIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.59 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.71 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
COWS vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum NIXT drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and NIXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWS | NIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.76% | -27.75% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -11.71% | +5.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -2.37% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -5.96% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 3.47% | -1.36% |
Volatility
COWS vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) is 4.58%, while Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that COWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWS | NIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 5.00% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 14.08% | -3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 21.24% | -5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 23.31% | -4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 23.31% | -4.46% |
COWS vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
COWS vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison
COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than NIXT's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 1.60% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 0.67% |
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWS and NIXT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NIXT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to COWS (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWS dropped -24.76% vs NIXT's -27.75%.
On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 33.50% vs 30.18% for COWS. On fees, COWS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, COWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 33.50% return vs 30.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for NIXT.
COWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.35% for NIXT.
COWS tracks Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index, while NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Research Affiliates. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for COWS and 0.09% for NIXT.
COWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWS and NIXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer