COWS vs. ^GSPC
COWS (Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past year, COWS returned 30.18% vs 26.52% for ^GSPC. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
COWS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return.
COWS
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 9.22%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
COWS vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 9.22% | 15.29% | 11.08% | 9.28% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 10.35% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 6.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWS and ^GSPC is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between COWS and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWS vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
COWS
^GSPC
COWS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 2.24 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 3.07 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 2.93 | +1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 13.52 | +0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.24 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.47 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
COWS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.76% | -56.78% | +32.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -9.10% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.74% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -10.72% | +6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 1.97% | +0.14% |
Volatility
COWS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.93%. This indicates that COWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 2.93% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 8.99% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 11.89% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 16.90% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 18.06% | +0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWS and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COWS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to ^GSPC (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWS dropped -24.76% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWS and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer